DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: "'Joseph, Anoob'" <Anoob.Joseph@caviumnetworks.com>,
	"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Cc: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	Ankur Dwivedi <ankur.dwivedi@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Narayana Prasad <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:41:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8977F8DE987@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d67077ce-f9fe-0090-9982-9f78c4f5bfef@caviumnetworks.com>

Hi Anoob,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph, Anoob [mailto:Anoob.Joseph@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 3:56 AM
> To: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Cc: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>; Ankur Dwivedi
> <ankur.dwivedi@caviumnetworks.com>; Jerin Jacob
> <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>; Narayana Prasad
> <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom
> requirement
> 
> Hi Declan,
> 
> Please see inline.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anoob
> 
> 
> On 26-06-2018 15:42, Doherty, Declan wrote:
> > External Email
> >
> > On 19/06/2018 7:26 AM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
> >> Enabling crypto devs to specify the minimum headroom and tailroom it
> >> expects in the mbuf. For net PMDs, standard headroom has to be
> >> honoured by applications, which is not strictly followed for crypto
> >> devs. This
> >
> > How is this done for NET PMDs, I don't see anything explicit in the
> > ehtdev API for specification of headroom requirements.
> In rte_mbuf.h, the minimum size required for packets involved in rx/tx is
> specified and that considers headroom also. Applications usually use these
> default macros while creating mbufs which are involved in rx/tx.
> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h#n411
> >
> >> prevents crypto devs from using free space in mbuf (available as
> >> head/tailroom) for internal requirements in crypto operations.
> >> Addition of head/tailroom requirement will help PMDs to communicate
> >> such requirements to the application.
> >>
> >> The availability and use of head/tailroom is an optimization if the
> >> hardware supports use of head/tailroom for crypto-op info. For
> >> devices that do not support using the head/tailroom, they can
> >> continue to operate without any performance-drop.
> >>
> > Is there any variations in requirements for terms headroom/tailroom on
> > a per algorithmic basis or is it purely for the device?
> It is purely per device basis. The device can specify upper bounds for the
> head/tailroom. A device that even specified the room, may not even use the
> entire room in all cases. So it doesn't have to be algo specific.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
> >> ---
> >>   doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 4 ++++
> >>   lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 6 ++++++
> >>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> >> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> >> index 1ce692e..a547289 100644
> >> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> >> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> >> @@ -122,3 +122,7 @@ Deprecation Notices
> >>     - Function ``rte_cryptodev_get_private_session_size()`` will be
> >> deprecated
> >>       in 18.05, and it gets replaced with
> >> ``rte_cryptodev_sym_get_private_session_size()``.
> >>       It will be removed in 18.08.
> >> +  - New field, ``min_headroom_req``, added in ``rte_cryptodev_info``
> >> structure. It will be
> >> +    added in 18.11.
> >> +  - New field, ``min_tailroom_req``, added in ``rte_cryptodev_info``
> >> structure. It will be
> >> +    added in 18.11.
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> >> b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> >> index 92ce6d4..fa944b8 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> >> @@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ struct rte_cryptodev_info {
> >>       unsigned max_nb_queue_pairs;
> >>       /**< Maximum number of queues pairs supported by device. */
> >>
> >> +     uint32_t min_headroom_req;
> >> +     /**< Minimum mbuf headroom required by device */
> >> +
> >> +     uint32_t min_tailroom_req;
> >> +     /**< Minimum mbuf tailroom required by device */

I would add the word "mbuf" here, in the variable names (e.g. min_mbuf_headroom_req),
to be more explicit.

Also, just let you know that we are currently modifying the info structure in this release.
Therefore, I think we could make these changes in now and then you don't need to add deprecation notices on this,
but better to add the API Change in release notes.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-28 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-19  6:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-06-19  6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-06-21 14:24   ` Akhil Goyal
2018-06-22  6:52     ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-22 10:03       ` Akhil Goyal
2018-06-26 10:12   ` Doherty, Declan
2018-06-28  2:56     ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-28 11:41       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo [this message]
2018-06-28 11:59         ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-19  6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom Anoob Joseph
2018-06-28 11:42   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-04 13:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 10:26     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 10:50       ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 11:07     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 11:16     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 11:48     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 12:23       ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 13:27         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 14:08           ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] test/crypto: skip validation of head/tailroom used by PMD Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/crypto: skip validation of head/tailroom used by PMD Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] crypto/scheduler: add minimum head/tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 17:20     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 17:29       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8977F8DE987@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=Anoob.Joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=ankur.dwivedi@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).