DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yang, Zhiyong" <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com" <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/vhost: remove limit of vhost TX burst size
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:24:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E182254E98A5DA4EB1E657AC7CB9BD2A3EB73C29@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ae31488-1ea6-abb8-7bd0-b5526dc9fc9f@redhat.com>

Hi, Maxime:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 5:44 PM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] net/vhost: remove limit of vhost TX burst size
> 
> 
> 
> On 02/24/2017 09:48 AM, Zhiyong Yang wrote:
> > vhost removes limit of TX burst size(32 pkts) and supports to make an
> > best effort to transmit pkts.
> >
> > Cc: yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com
> > Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> > b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> > index e98cffd..1e1fa34 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
> >  #define ETH_VHOST_QUEUES_ARG		"queues"
> >  #define ETH_VHOST_CLIENT_ARG		"client"
> >  #define ETH_VHOST_DEQUEUE_ZERO_COPY	"dequeue-zero-copy"
> > +#define VHOST_MAX_PKT_BURST 32
> >
> >  static const char *valid_arguments[] = {
> >  	ETH_VHOST_IFACE_ARG,
> > @@ -434,8 +435,27 @@ eth_vhost_tx(void *q, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> uint16_t nb_bufs)
> >  		goto out;
> >
> >  	/* Enqueue packets to guest RX queue */
> > -	nb_tx = rte_vhost_enqueue_burst(r->vid,
> > -			r->virtqueue_id, bufs, nb_bufs);
> > +	if (likely(nb_bufs <= VHOST_MAX_PKT_BURST))
> > +		nb_tx = rte_vhost_enqueue_burst(r->vid, r->virtqueue_id,
> > +						bufs, nb_bufs);
> > +	else {
> > +		uint16_t nb_send = nb_bufs;
> > +
> > +		while (nb_send) {
> > +			uint16_t nb_pkts;
> > +			uint16_t num = (uint16_t)RTE_MIN(nb_send,
> > +					VHOST_MAX_PKT_BURST);
> > +
> > +			nb_pkts = rte_vhost_enqueue_burst(r->vid,
> > +							  r->virtqueue_id,
> > +							  &bufs[nb_tx], num);
> > +
> > +			nb_tx += nb_pkts;
> > +			nb_send -= nb_pkts;
> > +			if (nb_pkts < num)
> > +				break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> It looks like the if/else could be avoided, but maybe you did so for
> performance reason?
> If this is the case, maybe you could add a comment or at least state this in the
> commit message.

Yes, you are right.
if/else can be avoided and code will  look more clean.
I  choose performance between them. 
Comments will be added in V2 here.

Thanks
Zhiyong

> 
> Thanks,
> Maxime
> >
> >  	r->stats.pkts += nb_tx;
> >  	r->stats.missed_pkts += nb_bufs - nb_tx;
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-24  8:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] consistent PMD batching behaviour Zhiyong Yang
2017-02-24  8:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] net/fm10k: remove limit of fm10k_xmit_pkts_vec burst size Zhiyong Yang
2017-02-24  9:32   ` Bruce Richardson
2017-02-24  9:36     ` Bruce Richardson
2017-02-24  9:48       ` Yang, Zhiyong
2017-03-03 11:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] consistent PMD batching behaviour Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-03 11:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] net/fm10k: remove limit of fm10k_xmit_pkts_vec burst size Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-29  7:16       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] consistent PMD batching behaviour Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-29  7:16         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/fm10k: remove limit of fm10k_xmit_pkts_vec burst size Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-29  7:16         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] net/i40e: remove limit of i40e_xmit_pkts_vec " Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-29  7:16         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] net/ixgbe: remove limit of ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec " Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-29  7:16         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] net/vhost: remove limit of vhost TX " Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-29  7:16         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] net/vhost: remove limit of vhost RX " Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-30 12:54         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] consistent PMD batching behaviour Ferruh Yigit
2017-03-31  7:00           ` Yao, Lei A
2017-03-03 11:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: remove limit of i40e_xmit_pkts_vec burst size Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-24 14:03       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-03-03 11:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ixgbe: remove limit of ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec " Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-03 11:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/vhost: remove limit of vhost TX " Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-03 11:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/vhost: remove limit of vhost RX " Zhiyong Yang
2017-03-05 13:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] consistent PMD batching behaviour Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-03-06  2:13       ` Yang, Zhiyong
2017-03-24 14:02     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-03-25  6:29       ` Yang, Zhiyong
2017-03-28 10:00       ` Yang, Zhiyong
2017-03-28 10:05         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-24  8:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/i40e: remove limit of i40e_xmit_pkts_vec burst size Zhiyong Yang
2017-02-24  8:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/ixgbe: remove limit of ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec " Zhiyong Yang
2017-02-24  8:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/vhost: remove limit of vhost TX " Zhiyong Yang
2017-02-24 11:08   ` Kevin Traynor
2017-02-24 13:04     ` Bruce Richardson
2017-02-24 13:33       ` Kevin Traynor
2017-03-01  9:44   ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-03-01 13:24     ` Yang, Zhiyong [this message]
2017-02-24  8:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] net/vhost: remove limit of vhost RX " Zhiyong Yang
2017-02-24 11:41   ` Kevin Traynor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E182254E98A5DA4EB1E657AC7CB9BD2A3EB73C29@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=zhiyong.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).