From: "Yang, Zhiyong" <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
To: "Kozak, KubaX" <kubax.kozak@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Jastrzebski, MichalX K" <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:07:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E182254E98A5DA4EB1E657AC7CB9BD2A8AF2A3D6@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F6B2DFED41632040B39446096019FF8E0A18BCB9@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Kuba,
Just a soft reminder. :)
Maintainers will make the decision.
Ferruh, Thomas,
Your opinion?
Thanks
Zhiyong
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kozak, KubaX
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:58 PM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Jastrzebski, MichalX K
> <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value
>
> Thanks Zhiyong,
>
> Should I correct this patch and resend to dpdk or is it just a suggestion for future?
>
> Regards,
> Kuba
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Yang, Zhiyong
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 08:56
> >To: Kozak, KubaX <kubax.kozak@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kozak, KubaX <kubax.kozak@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> >Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value
> >
> >Hi，kubax,
> >
> >When you form the patch , you should add v2 and changes in v2.
> >Besides that, please be free to add
> >Acked-by: zhiyong yang<zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
> >
> >Thanks
> >Zhiyong
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Kuba Kozak
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 7:48 PM
> >> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kozak, KubaX <kubax.kozak@intel.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value
> >>
> >> Add return value check and error handling for fseek call.
> >>
> >> Coverity issue: 143435
> >> Fixes: 361b2e9559fc ("acl: new sample l3fwd-acl")
> >> Cc: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kuba Kozak <kubax.kozak@intel.com>
> >> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> >> ---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 11:48 [dpdk-stable] " Kuba Kozak
2017-10-10 6:55 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Yang, Zhiyong
2017-10-11 6:58 ` Kozak, KubaX
2017-10-11 7:07 ` Yang, Zhiyong [this message]
2017-10-13 22:41 ` [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E182254E98A5DA4EB1E657AC7CB9BD2A8AF2A3D6@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=zhiyong.yang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=kubax.kozak@intel.com \
--cc=michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).