DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "Yan, Zhirun" <zhirun.yan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix VF/PF port reset
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 02:56:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F5DF4F0E3AFEF648ADC1C3C33AD4DBF17A444D70@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181205124625.24398-1-zhirun.yan@intel.com>

Hi, Zhirun

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhirun Yan
> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 8:46 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue
> <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Yan, Zhirun <zhirun.yan@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix VF/PF port reset
> 
> Port reset will call i40evf_uninit_vf() to release resource. It wants to call
> i40evf_dev_close() to do some clean work. Before this patch, port reset will
> never call i40evf_dev_close() to shutdown adminq. So the i40evf_dev_init() will
> failed.
> 
> The status of stop/start should be flaged by dev->data->dev_started.
> Close should be flaged by hw->adapter_stopped. This patch modify these flags
> both in VF and PF.
> 

For the fix patch need to add Fix line like:
Fixes: commit number ("commit log"), just refer to the old patch.

> Signed-off-by: Zhirun Yan <zhirun.yan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c    | 13 ++++++-------
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index 7030eb1fa..8eaf6eba6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -2391,15 +2391,11 @@ static void
>  i40e_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	struct i40e_pf *pf = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_PF(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> -	struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
>  	struct i40e_vsi *main_vsi = pf->main_vsi;
>  	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(dev);
>  	struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle = &pci_dev->intr_handle;
>  	int i;
> 
> -	if (hw->adapter_stopped == 1)
> -		return;
> -

adapter_stopped is used to avoid double call dev_stop, why you remove the check here?
Do you add another mechanism to do the same thing?

>  	if (dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq == 0) {
>  		rte_eal_alarm_cancel(i40e_dev_alarm_handler, dev);
>  		rte_intr_enable(intr_handle);
> @@ -2442,8 +2438,6 @@ i40e_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> 
>  	/* reset hierarchy commit */
>  	pf->tm_conf.committed = false;
> -
> -	hw->adapter_stopped = 1;
>  }
> 
>  static void
> @@ -2460,7 +2454,10 @@ i40e_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> 
>  	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> 
> -	i40e_dev_stop(dev);
> +	if (dev->data->dev_started != 0) {
> +		dev->data->dev_started = 0;
> +		i40e_dev_stop(dev);
> +	}
> 
>  	/* Remove all mirror rules */
>  	while ((p_mirror = TAILQ_FIRST(&pf->mirror_list))) { @@ -2523,6
> +2520,8 @@ i40e_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>  	I40E_WRITE_REG(hw, I40E_PFGEN_CTRL,
>  			(reg | I40E_PFGEN_CTRL_PFSWR_MASK));
>  	I40E_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> +
> +	hw->adapter_stopped = 1;

If you remove all the other hw->adapter_stopped, it's useless to add here.

>  }
> 
>  /*
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> index ae55b9b18..cbe9bec3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> @@ -1924,15 +1924,12 @@ static int
>  i40evf_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)  {
>  	struct i40e_vf *vf = I40EVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_VF(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> -	struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
>  	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(dev);
>  	struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle = &pci_dev->intr_handle;
>  	uint32_t intr_vector = 0;
> 
>  	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> 
> -	hw->adapter_stopped = 0;
> -

Question the same, will induce any problem?

>  	vf->max_pkt_len = dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len;
>  	vf->num_queue_pairs = RTE_MAX(dev->data->nb_rx_queues,
>  					dev->data->nb_tx_queues);
> @@ -2004,7 +2001,6 @@ i40evf_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)  {
>  	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(dev);
>  	struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle = &pci_dev->intr_handle;
> -	struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
>  	struct i40e_vf *vf = I40EVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_VF(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> 
>  	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> @@ -2012,8 +2008,6 @@ i40evf_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>  	if (dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq != 0)
>  		rte_intr_disable(intr_handle);
> 
> -	if (hw->adapter_stopped == 1)
> -		return;
>  	i40evf_stop_queues(dev);
>  	i40evf_disable_queues_intr(dev);
>  	i40e_dev_clear_queues(dev);
> @@ -2029,7 +2023,6 @@ i40evf_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>  	/* remove all multicast addresses */
>  	i40evf_add_del_mc_addr_list(dev, vf->mc_addrs, vf->mc_addrs_num,
>  				FALSE);
> -	hw->adapter_stopped = 1;
> 
>  }
> 
> @@ -2246,7 +2239,11 @@ i40evf_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)  {
>  	struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> 
> -	i40evf_dev_stop(dev);
> +	if (dev->data->dev_started != 0) {
> +		dev->data->dev_started = 0;
> +		i40evf_dev_stop(dev);
> +	}
> +
>  	i40e_dev_free_queues(dev);
>  	/*
>  	 * disable promiscuous mode before reset vf @@ -2255,11 +2252,13
> @@ i40evf_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>  	 */
>  	i40evf_dev_promiscuous_disable(dev);
>  	i40evf_dev_allmulticast_disable(dev);
> -
>  	i40evf_reset_vf(hw);
> +
>  	i40e_shutdown_adminq(hw);
>  	i40evf_disable_irq0(hw);
>  	rte_eal_alarm_cancel(i40evf_dev_alarm_handler, dev);
> +
> +	hw->adapter_stopped = 1;
>  }
> 
>  /*
> --
> 2.17.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-06  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-05 12:46 Zhirun Yan
2018-12-05 12:51 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-12-06  2:56 ` Yang, Qiming [this message]
2018-12-07  4:18   ` Yan, Zhirun
2018-12-10 13:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix VF/PF port close Zhirun Yan
2018-12-10 14:08   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Zhirun Yan
2018-12-10 12:20     ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F5DF4F0E3AFEF648ADC1C3C33AD4DBF17A444D70@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhirun.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).