From: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
Michael Savisko <michaelsav@nvidia.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
"NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] ethdev: add send to kernel action
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 09:57:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR12MB46661545E85829E0A156501ED65B9@MW2PR12MB4666.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5c43cbd-60a7-0649-2c6e-a550134831fb@oktetlabs.ru>
Hi Andrew,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: Monday, 3 October 2022 12:44
>
> On 10/3/22 11:23, Ori Kam wrote:
> > Hi Andrew
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> >> Sent: Monday, 3 October 2022 10:54
> >> On 9/29/22 17:54, Michael Savisko wrote:
> >>> In some cases application may receive a packet that should have been
> >>> received by the kernel. In this case application uses KNI or other means
> >>> to transfer the packet to the kernel.
> >>>
> >>> With bifurcated driver we can have a rule to route packets matching
> >>> a pattern (example: IPv4 packets) to the DPDK application and the rest
> >>> of the traffic will be received by the kernel.
> >>> But if we want to receive most of the traffic in DPDK except specific
> >>> pattern (example: ICMP packets) that should be processed by the
> kernel,
> >>> then it's easier to re-route these packets with a single rule.
> >>>
> >>> This commit introduces new rte_flow action which allows application to
> >>> re-route packets directly to the kernel without software involvement.
> >>>
> >>> Add new testpmd rte_flow action 'send_to_kernel'. The application
> >>> may use this action to route the packet to the kernel while still
> >>> in the HW.
> >>>
> >>> Example with testpmd command:
> >>>
> >>> flow create 0 ingress priority 0 group 1 pattern eth type spec 0x0800
> >>> type mask 0xffff / end actions send_to_kernel / end
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Savisko <michaelsav@nvidia.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> v4:
> >>> - improve description comment above
> >> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SEND_TO_KERNEL
> >>>
> >>> v3:
> >>> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220919155013.61473-1-
> >> michaelsav@nvidia.com/
> >>>
> >>> v2:
> >>> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220914093219.11728-1-
> >> michaelsav@nvidia.com/
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 2 ++
> >>> lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c | 1 +
> >>> lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-
> pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> >>> index 7f50028eb7..042f6b34a6 100644
> >>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> >>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> >>> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ enum index {
> >>> ACTION_PORT_REPRESENTOR_PORT_ID,
> >>> ACTION_REPRESENTED_PORT,
> >>> ACTION_REPRESENTED_PORT_ETHDEV_PORT_ID,
> >>> + ACTION_SEND_TO_KERNEL,
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> /** Maximum size for pattern in struct rte_flow_item_raw. */
> >>> @@ -1872,6 +1873,7 @@ static const enum index next_action[] = {
> >>> ACTION_CONNTRACK_UPDATE,
> >>> ACTION_PORT_REPRESENTOR,
> >>> ACTION_REPRESENTED_PORT,
> >>> + ACTION_SEND_TO_KERNEL,
> >>> ZERO,
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> @@ -6341,6 +6343,13 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
> >>> .help = "submit a list of associated actions for red",
> >>> .next = NEXT(next_action),
> >>> },
> >>> + [ACTION_SEND_TO_KERNEL] = {
> >>> + .name = "send_to_kernel",
> >>> + .help = "send packets to kernel",
> >>> + .priv = PRIV_ACTION(SEND_TO_KERNEL, 0),
> >>> + .next = NEXT(NEXT_ENTRY(ACTION_NEXT)),
> >>> + .call = parse_vc,
> >>> + },
> >>>
> >>> /* Top-level command. */
> >>> [ADD] = {
> >>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> >> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> >>> index 330e34427d..c259c8239a 100644
> >>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> >>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> >>> @@ -4189,6 +4189,8 @@ This section lists supported actions and their
> >> attributes, if any.
> >>>
> >>> - ``ethdev_port_id {unsigned}``: ethdev port ID
> >>>
> >>> +- ``send_to_kernel``: send packets to kernel.
> >>> +
> >>> Destroying flow rules
> >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> >>> index 501be9d602..627c671ce4 100644
> >>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> >>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> >>> @@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ static const struct rte_flow_desc_data
> >> rte_flow_desc_action[] = {
> >>> MK_FLOW_ACTION(CONNTRACK, sizeof(struct
> >> rte_flow_action_conntrack)),
> >>> MK_FLOW_ACTION(PORT_REPRESENTOR, sizeof(struct
> >> rte_flow_action_ethdev)),
> >>> MK_FLOW_ACTION(REPRESENTED_PORT, sizeof(struct
> >> rte_flow_action_ethdev)),
> >>> + MK_FLOW_ACTION(SEND_TO_KERNEL, 0),
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> int
> >>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> >>> index a79f1e7ef0..2c15279a3b 100644
> >>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> >>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> >>> @@ -2879,6 +2879,18 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
> >>> * @see struct rte_flow_action_ethdev
> >>> */
> >>> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_REPRESENTED_PORT,
> >>> +
> >>> + /**
> >>> + * Send packets to the kernel, without going to userspace at all.
> >>> + * The packets will be received by the kernel driver sharing
> >>> + * the same device as the DPDK port on which this action is
> >>> + * configured. This action is mostly suits bifurcated driver
> >>> + * model.
> >>> + * This is an ingress non-transfer action only.
> >>
> >> May be we should not limit the definition to ingress only?
> >> It could be useful on egress as a way to reroute packet
> >> back to kernel.
> >>
> >
> > Interesting, but there are no Kernel queues on egress that can receive
> packets (by definition of egress)
> > do you mean that this will also do loopback from the egress back to the
> ingress of the same port and then
> > send to kernel?
> > if so, I think we need a new action "loop_back"
>
> Yes, I meant intercept packet on egress and send to kernel.
> But we still need loopback+send_to_kernel. Loopback itself
> cannot send to kernel. Moreover it should be two rules:
> loopback on egress plus send-to-kernel on ingress. Does
> it really worse it? I'm not sure. Yes, it sounds a bit
> better from arch point of view, but I'm still unsure.
> I'd allow send-to-kernel on egress. Up to you.
>
It looks more correct with loop_back on the egress and send-to-kernel on egress
I suggest to keep the current design,
and if we see that we can merge those to commands, we will change it
> >
> >>
> >>> + *
> >>> + * No associated configuration structure.
> >>> + */
> >>> + RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SEND_TO_KERNEL,
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-03 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-11 11:35 [RFC] " Michael Savisko
2022-08-15 12:02 ` Ori Kam
2022-08-16 9:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-12 13:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-12 13:39 ` Michael Savisko
2022-09-12 14:41 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-09-13 12:09 ` Michael Savisko
2022-09-14 9:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-14 9:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Savisko
2022-09-19 15:50 ` [PATCH v3] " Michael Savisko
2022-09-20 11:08 ` Ori Kam
2022-09-26 13:06 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-09-28 14:30 ` Michael Savisko
2022-09-29 14:54 ` [PATCH v4] " Michael Savisko
2022-10-03 7:53 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-03 8:23 ` Ori Kam
2022-10-03 9:44 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-03 9:57 ` Ori Kam [this message]
2022-10-03 10:47 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-03 11:06 ` Ori Kam
2022-10-03 11:08 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-03 16:34 ` [PATCH v5] " Michael Savisko
2022-10-04 7:48 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-09-20 10:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Ori Kam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW2PR12MB46661545E85829E0A156501ED65B9@MW2PR12MB4666.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=asafp@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
--cc=michaelsav@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).