DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
	Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	"NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: RE: [RFC] ethdev: sharing indirect actions between ports
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 14:20:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR12MB4666A79B319EB6B913353B7CD6F99@MW2PR12MB4666.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221228165433.18185-1-viacheslavo@nvidia.com>

Hi Slava,

Looks good to me,
Best,
Ori

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 December 2022 18:55
> 
> The RTE Flow API implements the concept of shared objects,
> known as indirect actions (RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT).
> An application can create the indirect action of desired
> type and configuration with rte_flow_action_handle_create
> call and then specify the obtained action handle in multiple
> flows.
> 
> The initial concept supposes the action handle has strict
> attachment to the port it was created on and to be used
> exclusively in the flows being installed on the port.
> 
> Nowadays the multipath network topologies are quite common,
> packets belonging to the same connection might arrive and
> be sent over multiple ports, and there is the raising demand
> to handle these "spread" connections. To fulfil this demand
> it is proposed to extend indirect action sharing across the
> multiple ports. This kind of sharing would be extremely useful
> for the meters and counters, allowing to manage the single
> connection over the multiple ports.
> 
> This cross-port object sharing is hard to implement in
> generic way merely with software on the upper layers, but
> can be provided by the driver over the single hardware
> instance, where  multiple ports reside on the same physical
> NIC and share the same hardware context.
> 
> To allow this action sharing application should specify
> the "host port" during flow configuring to claim the intention
> to share the indirect actions. All indirect actions reside within
> "host port" context and can be shared in flows being installed
> on the host port and on all the ports referencing this one.
> 
> If sharing between host and port being configured is not supported
> the configuration should be rejected with error. There might be
> multiple independent (mutual exclusive) sharing domains with
> dedicated host and referencing ports.
> 
> To manage the shared indirect action any port from sharing domain
> can be specified. To share or not the created action is up to
> application, no API change is needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c |  6 ++++++
>  lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> index 7d0c24366c..692d37925a 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> @@ -1476,6 +1476,12 @@ rte_flow_configure(uint16_t port_id,
>  		RTE_FLOW_LOG(ERR, "Port %"PRIu16" queue info is
> NULL.\n", port_id);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> +	if ((port_attr->flags & RTE_FLOW_PORT_FLAG_SHARE_INDIRECT) &&
> +	     !rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(port_attr->host_port_id)) {
> +		return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENODEV,
> +
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> +					  NULL, rte_strerror(ENODEV));
> +	}
>  	if (likely(!!ops->configure)) {
>  		ret = ops->configure(dev, port_attr, nb_queue, queue_attr,
> error);
>  		if (ret == 0)
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> index b60987db4b..c784f4ec30 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -4903,6 +4903,13 @@ rte_flow_info_get(uint16_t port_id,
>  		  struct rte_flow_queue_info *queue_info,
>  		  struct rte_flow_error *error);
> 
> +/**
> + * Indicate all steering objects should be created on contexts
> + * of the host port, providing indirect object sharing beetween
> + * ports.
> + */
> +#define RTE_FLOW_PORT_FLAG_SHARE_INDIRECT RTE_BIT32(0)
> +
>  /**
>   * @warning
>   * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> @@ -4932,6 +4939,10 @@ struct rte_flow_port_attr {
>  	 * @see RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_CONNTRACK
>  	 */
>  	uint32_t nb_conn_tracks;
> +	/**
> +	 * Port to base shared objects on.
> +	 */
> +	uint16_t host_port_id;
>  	/**
>  	 * Port flags (RTE_FLOW_PORT_FLAG_*).
>  	 */
> --
> 2.18.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-08 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-28 16:54 Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-01-08 14:20 ` Ori Kam [this message]
2023-01-18 12:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-18 15:17   ` Ori Kam
2023-01-18 16:21     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-18 16:37       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-01-20 12:22         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-01-26 15:15           ` Ori Kam
2023-02-06  9:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-06  9:52   ` [PATCH 2/9] net/mlx5/hws: Matcher, Free FT from RTC id before set the new value Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-06  9:52   ` [PATCH 3/9] net/mlx5/hws: fix disconnecting matcher Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-06  9:52   ` [PATCH 4/9] common/mlx5: add cross port object sharing capability Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-06  9:52   ` [PATCH 5/9] net/mlx5: add cross port shared mode for HW steering Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-06  9:52   ` [PATCH 6/9] net/mlx5: support counters in cross port shared mode Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-06  9:52   ` [PATCH 7/9] app/testpmd: add host port parameter into flow config Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-06  9:52   ` [PATCH 8/9] app/testpmd: add shared indirect action support Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-06  9:52   ` [PATCH 9/9] doc: update cross-port indirect shared action Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-07 14:01   ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ethdev: sharing indirect actions between ports Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-07 14:01     ` [PATCH v2 2/9] app/testpmd: add host port parameter into flow config Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-09 14:48       ` Ori Kam
2023-02-07 14:02     ` [PATCH v2 3/9] app/testpmd: add shared indirect action support Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-09 14:48       ` Ori Kam
2023-02-07 14:02     ` [PATCH v2 4/9] net/mlx5/hws: free FT from RTC id before set the new value Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-07 14:02     ` [PATCH v2 5/9] net/mlx5/hws: fix disconnecting matcher Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-07 14:02     ` [PATCH v2 6/9] common/mlx5: add cross port object sharing capability Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-07 14:02     ` [PATCH v2 7/9] net/mlx5: add cross port shared mode for HW steering Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-07 14:02     ` [PATCH v2 8/9] net/mlx5: support counters in cross port shared mode Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-07 14:02     ` [PATCH v2 9/9] doc: update cross-port indirect shared action Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-09 14:49       ` Ori Kam
2023-02-10 14:35       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-08 12:21     ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ethdev: sharing indirect actions between ports Ori Kam
2023-02-09 14:47     ` Ori Kam
2023-02-10 14:34     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-10 14:38       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-02-10 15:17   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] *ethdev: sharing indirect actions between port* Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-10 15:17     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: sharing indirect actions between ports Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-10 15:17     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: add host port parameter into flow config Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-10 15:17     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] app/testpmd: add shared indirect action support Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-10 23:02     ` [PATCH v3 0/3] *ethdev: sharing indirect actions between port* Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-13 13:37   ` [PATCH v4 0/5] net/mlx5: sharing indirect actions between port Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-13 13:37     ` [PATCH v4 1/5] net/mlx5/hws: free FT from RTC ID before set the new value Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-13 13:37     ` [PATCH v4 2/5] net/mlx5/hws: fix disconnecting matcher Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-13 13:37     ` [PATCH v4 3/5] common/mlx5: add cross port object sharing capability Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-13 13:37     ` [PATCH v4 4/5] net/mlx5: add cross port shared mode for HW steering Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-13 13:37     ` [PATCH v4 5/5] net/mlx5: support counters in cross port shared mode Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-02-15 13:29     ` [PATCH v4 0/5] net/mlx5: sharing indirect actions between port Raslan Darawsheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW2PR12MB4666A79B319EB6B913353B7CD6F99@MW2PR12MB4666.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).