From: Tejasree Kondoj <ktejasree@marvell.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Cc: Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya <pathreya@marvell.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] security: allow application to specify UDP ports to PMD
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:13:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR18MB11044EB8ECBC349BB21EF086A83A0@MWHPR18MB1104.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB3168BACEB16188A6AC1FF6DDE6270@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Akhil,
Please see inline.
Thanks
Tejasree
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 12:39 AM
> To: Tejasree Kondoj <ktejasree@marvell.com>; Radu Nicolau
> <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
> Cc: Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya <pathreya@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph
> <anoobj@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH] security: allow application to specify UDP ports to
> PMD
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Tejasree,
>
> > Add UDP source and destination ports in ipsec_xform to allow
> > application to specify ports to be used for IPsec UDP encapsulation as
> > they are dynamically changed by NAT in between. Also adding an extra
> > flag to indicate whether PMD needs to perform encapsulation header
> > verification in case of inbound. In case of inline IPsec
> > implementation, verification of outer IP headers and UDP encapsulation
> > headers need to be handled in the PMD. For lookaside IPsec,
> > application can optionally offload this to the PMD.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejasree Kondoj <ktejasree@marvell.com>
> > ---
>
> I think we should add some usage of these newly added params
> - either in app/test or in examples/ipsec-secgw
[Tejasree] You mean adding test case in either of the above apps or addition of PMD implementation also? Also is the proposal sounds fine?
>
> Regards,
> Akhil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-21 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-03 6:42 Tejasree Kondoj
2020-09-10 19:09 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-21 9:13 ` Tejasree Kondoj [this message]
2020-09-21 9:30 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-21 12:03 ` Tejasree Kondoj
2021-01-11 19:20 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-01-12 6:51 ` Tejasree Kondoj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MWHPR18MB11044EB8ECBC349BB21EF086A83A0@MWHPR18MB1104.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ktejasree@marvell.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=pathreya@marvell.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).