From: "Liu, Changpeng" <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] vhost: use try_lock in rte_vhost_vring_call
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:29:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5093F694F8E386CD6B5808ECEE4C9@PH0PR11MB5093.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a63f996-84f4-434f-1b19-5dd035870e9d@redhat.com>
Hi Maxime,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 3:19 PM
> To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: use try_lock in rte_vhost_vring_call
>
>
>
> On 9/6/22 04:22, Changpeng Liu wrote:
> > Note that this function is in data path, so the thread context
> > may not same as socket messages processing context, by using
> > try_lock here, users can have another try in case of VQ's access
> > lock is held by `vhost-events` thread.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/vhost/vhost.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.c b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> > index 60cb05a0ff..072d2acb7b 100644
> > --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> > +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> > @@ -1329,7 +1329,11 @@ rte_vhost_vring_call(int vid, uint16_t vring_idx)
> > if (!vq)
> > return -1;
> >
> > - rte_spinlock_lock(&vq->access_lock);
> > + if (!rte_spinlock_trylock(&vq->access_lock)) {
> > + VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(dev->ifname, DEBUG,
> > + "failed to kick guest, virtqueue busy.\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> >
> > if (vq_is_packed(dev))
> > vhost_vring_call_packed(dev, vq);
>
> I think that's problematic, because it will break other applications
> that currently rely on the API to block until the call is done.
>
> Just some internal DPDK usage of this API:
> ./drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c:871: rte_vhost_vring_call(internal->vid,
> qid);
> ./examples/vhost/virtio_net.c:236: rte_vhost_vring_call(dev->vid, queue_id);
> ./examples/vhost/virtio_net.c:446: rte_vhost_vring_call(dev->vid, queue_id);
> ./examples/vhost_blk/vhost_blk.c:99:
> rte_vhost_vring_call(task->ctrlr->vid, vq->id);
> ./examples/vhost_blk/vhost_blk.c:134:
> rte_vhost_vring_call(task->ctrlr->vid, vq->id);
>
> This change will break all the above uses.
>
> And that's not counting external projects.
>
> ou should better introduce a new API that does not block.
Could you add a new API to do this?
I think we can use the new API in SPDK as a workaround, note that SPDK project is blocked for
a while which can't be used with DPDK 22.05 or newer.
Vhost-blk and scsi devices are not same with vhost-net, we need to cover SeaBIOS and VM
cases, so we need to start processing vrings after 1 vring is ready.
>
> Regards,
> Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 2:22 Changpeng Liu
2022-09-06 21:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-09-07 0:40 ` Liu, Changpeng
2022-09-20 7:12 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-20 2:24 ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-09-20 2:34 ` Liu, Changpeng
2022-09-20 2:53 ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-09-20 3:00 ` Liu, Changpeng
2022-09-20 7:23 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-20 7:30 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-20 7:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-20 7:29 ` Liu, Changpeng [this message]
2022-09-20 7:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-20 7:45 ` Liu, Changpeng
2022-09-20 8:12 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-20 8:43 ` Liu, Changpeng
2022-09-21 9:41 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-21 9:52 ` Liu, Changpeng
2022-10-11 11:56 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-12 6:40 ` [PATCH v2] vhost: add new `rte_vhost_vring_call_nonblock` API Changpeng Liu
2022-10-13 7:56 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-17 6:46 ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-10-17 7:17 ` Liu, Changpeng
2022-10-17 7:14 ` [PATCH v3] " Changpeng Liu
2022-10-17 7:39 ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-10-17 7:50 ` Liu, Changpeng
2022-10-17 7:48 ` [PATCH v4] " Changpeng Liu
2022-10-19 5:27 ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-10-26 9:24 ` Xia, Chenbo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB5093F694F8E386CD6B5808ECEE4C9@PH0PR11MB5093.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).