From: "Jiawei(Jonny) Wang" <jiaweiw@nvidia.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
"NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:07:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR12MB5451A963ACC4E8FF4E13FB65C6A19@PH0PR12MB5451.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <661e99ab-c05f-0be3-d877-31e4b911e67f@amd.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 9:01 PM
> To: Jiawei(Jonny) Wang <jiaweiw@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-
> Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas@monjalon.net>;
> andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports
>
> On 2/17/2023 10:50 AM, Jiawei Wang wrote:
> > When multiple ports are aggregated into a single DPDK port,
> > (example: Linux bonding, DPDK bonding, failsafe, etc.), we want to
> > know which port is used for Rx and Tx.
> >
> > This patch introduces the new ethdev API
> > rte_eth_dev_map_aggr_tx_affinity(), it's used to map a Tx queue with
> > an aggregated port of the DPDK port (specified with port_id), The
> > affinity is the number of the aggregated port.
> > Value 0 means no affinity and traffic could be routed to any
> > aggregated port, this is the default current behavior.
> >
> > The maximum number of affinity is given by rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports().
> >
> > This patch allows to map a Rx queue with an aggregated port by using a
> > flow rule. The new item is called RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_AGGR_AFFINITY.
> >
> > While uses the aggregated affinity as a matching item in the flow
> > rule, and sets the same affinity value by call
> > rte_eth_dev_map_aggr_tx_affinity(), then the packet can be sent from
> > the same port as the receiving one.
> > The affinity numbering starts from 1, then trying to match on
> > aggr_affinity 0 will result in an error.
> >
> > RFC:
> > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20221221102934.13822-1-jiaw
> > eiw@nvidia.com/
> >
> > v6:
> > * Update the commit titles.
> > * Return 0 by default if dev_ops.count_aggr_ports is not defined.
> > * Adds the dev_configure and affinity value checking before call
> map_aggr_tx_affinity.
> > * Update the rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports description.
> >
> > v5:
> > * Adds rte_eth_dev_map_aggr_tx_affinity() to map a Tx queue to an
> aggregated port.
> > * Adds rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports() to get the number of aggregated
> ports.
> > * Updates the flow item RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_AGGR_AFFINITY.
> >
> > v4:
> > * Rebase the latest code
> > * Update new field description
> > * Update release release note
> > * Reword the commit log to make clear
> >
> > v3:
> > * Update exception rule
> > * Update the commit log
> > * Add the description for PHY affinity and numbering definition
> > * Add the number of physical ports into device info
> > * Change the patch order
> >
> > v2: Update based on the comments
> >
> > Jiawei Wang (2):
> > ethdev: add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports
> > ethdev: add flow matching of aggregated port
>
> It looks like there will be a new version, can you please rebase next version on
> top of next-net [1], there are multiple conflicts with this patch, it is safer if you
> resolve them yourself.
>
> [1]
> https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net/
Sure, will send the v7 and rebase on it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221221102934.13822-1-jiaweiw@nvidia.com/>
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] add new PHY affinity in the flow item and Tx queue API Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: add PHY affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] add new PHY affinity in the flow item and Tx queue API Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-06 15:29 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-07 9:40 ` Ori Kam
2023-02-09 19:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-10 14:06 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 9:38 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 10:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: add PHY affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Added support for Tx queue mapping with an aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: introduce the Tx map API for aggregated ports Jiawei Wang
2023-02-15 11:41 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-16 17:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-17 6:45 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-16 17:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 6:44 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 8:24 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-17 9:50 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ethdev: add Aggregated affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-16 17:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-17 6:45 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: add " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 12:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 12:56 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-17 12:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 13:05 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 13:41 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 15:03 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-17 15:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] ethdev: add flow matching of aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 13:01 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 13:07 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang [this message]
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] ethdev: add " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] ethdev: add flow matching of aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR12MB5451A963ACC4E8FF4E13FB65C6A19@PH0PR12MB5451.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=jiaweiw@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).