From: "Jiawei(Jonny) Wang" <jiaweiw@nvidia.com>
To: "NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC 2/5] ethdev: introduce the affinity field in Tx queue API
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:44:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR12MB5451F8E438579A457BC5142DC6C79@PH0PR12MB5451.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2006382.jNaZZp9DzI@thomas>
Hi,
>
> 21/12/2022 11:29, Jiawei Wang:
> > For the multiple hardware ports connect to a single DPDK port
> > (mhpsdp), the previous patch introduces the new rte flow item to match
> > the port affinity of the received packets.
> >
> > This patch adds the tx_affinity setting in Tx queue API, the affinity
> > value reflects packets be sent to which hardware port.
>
> I think "affinity" means we would like packet to be sent on a specific hardware
> port, but it is not mandatory.
> Is it the meaning you want? Or should it be a mandatory port?
>
Right, it's optional setting not mandatory.
> > Adds the new tx_affinity field into the padding hole of rte_eth_txconf
> > structure, the size of rte_eth_txconf keeps the same. Adds a suppress
> > type for structure change in the ABI check file.
> >
> > This patch adds the testpmd command line:
> > testpmd> port config (port_id) txq (queue_id) affinity (value)
> >
> > For example, there're two hardware ports connects to a single DPDK
>
> connects -> connected
>
OK, will fix in next version.
> > port (port id 0), and affinity 1 stood for hard port 1 and affinity
> > 2 stood for hardware port 2, used the below command to config tx
> > affinity for each TxQ:
> > port config 0 txq 0 affinity 1
> > port config 0 txq 1 affinity 1
> > port config 0 txq 2 affinity 2
> > port config 0 txq 3 affinity 2
> >
> > These commands config the TxQ index 0 and TxQ index 1 with affinity 1,
> > uses TxQ 0 or TxQ 1 send packets, these packets will be sent from the
> > hardware port 1, and similar with hardware port 2 if sending packets
> > with TxQ 2 or TxQ 3.
>
> [...]
> > @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ API Changes
> > +* ethdev: added a new field:
> > +
> > + - Tx affinity per-queue ``rte_eth_txconf.tx_affinity``
>
> Adding a new field is not an API change because existing applications don't
> need to update their code if they don't care this new field.
> I think you can remove this note.
>
OK, will remove in next version.
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > @@ -1138,6 +1138,7 @@ struct rte_eth_txconf {
> > less free descriptors than this value. */
> >
> > uint8_t tx_deferred_start; /**< Do not start queue with
> > rte_eth_dev_start(). */
> > + uint8_t tx_affinity; /**< Drives the setting of affinity per-queue.
> > +*/
>
> Why "Drives"? It is the setting, right?
> rte_eth_txconf is per-queue so no need to repeat.
> I think a good comment here would be to mention it is a physical port index for
> mhpsdp.
> Another good comment would be to specify how ports are numbered.
>
OK, will update the comment for this new setting.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-21 10:29 [RFC 0/5] add new port affinity item and affinity " Jiawei Wang
2022-12-21 10:29 ` [RFC 1/5] ethdev: add port affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-01-11 16:41 ` Ori Kam
2023-01-18 11:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-18 14:41 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-01-18 16:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-24 14:00 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2022-12-21 10:29 ` [RFC 2/5] ethdev: introduce the affinity field in Tx queue API Jiawei Wang
2023-01-11 16:47 ` Ori Kam
2023-01-18 11:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-18 14:44 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang [this message]
2023-01-18 16:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-24 13:32 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2022-12-21 10:29 ` [RFC 3/5] drivers: add lag Rx port affinity in PRM Jiawei Wang
2022-12-21 10:29 ` [RFC 4/5] net/mlx5: add port affinity item support Jiawei Wang
2022-12-21 10:29 ` [RFC 5/5] drivers: enhance the Tx queue affinity Jiawei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR12MB5451F8E438579A457BC5142DC6C79@PH0PR12MB5451.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=jiaweiw@nvidia.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).