From: Hanumanth Reddy Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v8 4/4] app/testpmd: support mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 19:56:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB4750392DB3F604E54800D9E7CB5F9@PH0PR18MB4750.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37a514bd-c2f3-d012-d99f-e673e29cbb9a@oktetlabs.ru>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2022 1:13 AM
> To: Hanumanth Reddy Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Ferruh Yigit
> <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v8 4/4] app/testpmd: support mulitiple mbuf pools per
> Rx queue
>
> On 10/7/22 21:16, Hanumanth Reddy Pothula wrote:
> > Thanks Andrew for helping me in merging the changes.
> >
> > In below if condition, rx_conf->offloads &
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT will be always true as are not setting
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT.
> > I think we need to do && operation.
> >
> > if (rx_pkt_nb_segs <= 1 ||
> > (rx_conf->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT) == 0) {
> > rx_conf->rx_seg = NULL;
> > rx_conf->rx_nseg = 0;
> > ret = rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(port_id, rx_queue_id,
> > nb_rx_desc, socket_id,
> > rx_conf, mp);
> > return ret;
> > }
>
> That's exactly what I'm talking about in the cover letter.
> I'm not sure in testpmd patch at all. So, I vote for postponing testpmd part to rc2
> stage.
Okay, as you mentioned lets have testpmd maintainers review.
Thanks Andrew.
>
> >
> > Applied changes locally with && operation in above if condition and confirmed
> its working fine.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hanumanth
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> >> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 10:59 PM
> >> To: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Yuying Zhang
> >> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hanumanth Reddy Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
> >> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v8 4/4] app/testpmd: support mulitiple mbuf
> >> pools per Rx queue
> >>
> >> External Email
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >> From: Hanumanth Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
> >>
> >> Some of the HW has support for choosing memory pools based on the
> >> packet's size. The pool sort capability allows PMD/NIC to choose a
> >> memory pool based on the packet's length.
> >>
> >> On multiple mempool support enabled, populate mempool array and also
> >> print pool name on which packet is received.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hanumanth Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
> >> ---
> >> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >> app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 3 +++
> >> app/test-pmd/util.c | 4 ++--
> >> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> >> de6ad00138..2ce9953c76 100644
> >> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> >> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> >> @@ -2624,6 +2624,7 @@ rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t
> >> rx_queue_id,
> >> struct rte_eth_rxconf *rx_conf, struct rte_mempool *mp) {
> >> union rte_eth_rxseg rx_useg[MAX_SEGS_BUFFER_SPLIT] = {};
> >> + struct rte_mempool *rx_mempool[MAX_MEMPOOL] = {};
> >> unsigned int i, mp_n;
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> @@ -2645,16 +2646,29 @@ rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t
> >> rx_queue_id,
> >> */
> >> mp_n = (i >= mbuf_data_size_n) ? mbuf_data_size_n - 1 : i;
> >> mpx = mbuf_pool_find(socket_id, mp_n);
> >> - /* Handle zero as mbuf data buffer size. */
> >> - rx_seg->length = rx_pkt_seg_lengths[i] ?
> >> - rx_pkt_seg_lengths[i] :
> >> - mbuf_data_size[mp_n];
> >> - rx_seg->offset = i < rx_pkt_nb_offs ?
> >> - rx_pkt_seg_offsets[i] : 0;
> >> - rx_seg->mp = mpx ? mpx : mp;
> >> - }
> >> - rx_conf->rx_nseg = rx_pkt_nb_segs;
> >> - rx_conf->rx_seg = rx_useg;
> >> + if (rx_conf->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT)
> >> {
> >> + /**
> >> + * On Segment length zero, update length as,
> >> + * buffer size - headroom size
> >> + * to make sure enough space is accomidate for header.
> >> + */
> >> + rx_seg->length = rx_pkt_seg_lengths[i] ?
> >> + rx_pkt_seg_lengths[i] :
> >> + mbuf_data_size[mp_n] -
> >> RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
> >> + rx_seg->offset = i < rx_pkt_nb_offs ?
> >> + rx_pkt_seg_offsets[i] : 0;
> >> + rx_seg->mp = mpx ? mpx : mp;
> >> + } else {
> >> + rx_mempool[i] = mpx ? mpx : mp;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + if (rx_conf->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT) {
> >> + rx_conf->rx_nseg = rx_pkt_nb_segs;
> >> + rx_conf->rx_seg = rx_useg;
> >> + } else {
> >> + rx_conf->rx_mempools = rx_mempool;
> >> + rx_conf->rx_nmempool = rx_pkt_nb_segs;
> >> + }
> >> ret = rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(port_id, rx_queue_id, nb_rx_desc,
> >> socket_id, rx_conf, NULL);
> >> rx_conf->rx_seg = NULL;
> >> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h index
> >> cbbc7cc350..2f50a10d1f 100644
> >> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> >> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> >> @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ extern uint8_t cl_quit;
> >>
> >> #define MIN_TOTAL_NUM_MBUFS 1024
> >>
> >> +/* Maximum number of pools supported per Rx queue */ #define
> >> +MAX_MEMPOOL 8
> >> +
> >> typedef uint8_t lcoreid_t;
> >> typedef uint16_t portid_t;
> >> typedef uint16_t queueid_t;
> >> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/util.c b/app/test-pmd/util.c index
> >> fd98e8b51d..f9df5f69ef 100644
> >> --- a/app/test-pmd/util.c
> >> +++ b/app/test-pmd/util.c
> >> @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ dump_pkt_burst(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue,
> >> struct rte_mbuf *pkts[],
> >> print_ether_addr(" - dst=", ð_hdr->dst_addr,
> >> print_buf, buf_size, &cur_len);
> >> MKDUMPSTR(print_buf, buf_size, cur_len,
> >> - " - type=0x%04x - length=%u - nb_segs=%d",
> >> - eth_type, (unsigned int) mb->pkt_len,
> >> + " - pool=%s - type=0x%04x - length=%u -
> >> nb_segs=%d",
> >> + mb->pool->name, eth_type, (unsigned int) mb-
> >>> pkt_len,
> >> (int)mb->nb_segs);
> >> ol_flags = mb->ol_flags;
> >> if (ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH) {
> >> --
> >> 2.30.2
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-07 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-12 10:46 [PATCH v1 1/1] ethdev: introduce pool sort capability Hanumanth Pothula
2022-08-12 13:27 ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-12 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-08-12 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] app/testpmd: add command line argument 'rxseg-mode' Hanumanth Pothula
2022-08-12 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] net/cnxk: introduce pool sort capability Hanumanth Pothula
2022-08-23 3:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ethdev: " Ding, Xuan
2022-08-24 15:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-08-30 12:08 ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-06 12:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-07 7:02 ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-07 11:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-07 21:31 ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-13 9:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13 10:00 ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-02 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-02 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: Add support for " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-02 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] net/cnxk: introduce " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-13 8:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-09-13 9:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13 10:41 ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-15 7:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: Add support for mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-15 7:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] app/testpmd: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-15 7:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] net/cnxk: Add support for mulitiple mbuf pools Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-28 9:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: Add support for mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue Andrew Rybchenko
2022-09-28 11:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: support " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] net/cnxk: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] app/testpmd: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: " Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-07 14:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v6 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] net/cnxk: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] app/testpmd: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 18:14 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ethdev: " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-10-07 14:37 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 14:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] ethdev: factor out helper function to check Rx mempool Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 14:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] ethdev: support mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 16:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-07 16:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-07 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-07 16:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:30 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 14:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] net/cnxk: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 14:37 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] app/testpmd: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] ethdev: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] ethdev: factor out helper function to check Rx mempool Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] ethdev: support multiple mbuf pools per Rx queue Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 18:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-07 19:45 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] net/cnxk: support mulitiple " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] app/testpmd: " Andrew Rybchenko
[not found] ` <PH0PR18MB47500560DC1793F68E7312DDCB5F9@PH0PR18MB4750.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
2022-10-07 19:43 ` [EXT] " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 19:56 ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula [this message]
2022-10-17 8:48 ` [PATCH v9 1/1] " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-21 15:57 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-10-24 3:32 ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-10-24 4:07 ` [PATCH v10 1/1] app/testpmd: support multiple " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-25 1:40 ` [PATCH v11 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-11-01 14:13 ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-11-03 12:15 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-11-03 12:36 ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-11-03 15:20 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-11-04 15:38 ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-11-07 5:31 ` [PATCH v12 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-11-09 8:04 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-11-09 10:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-10 6:51 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-10 8:17 ` [PATCH v13 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-11-10 9:01 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-10 9:31 ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-11-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v14 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-11-10 10:47 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-17 8:43 ` Jiang, YuX
2022-11-17 11:38 ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-10-08 20:38 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] ethdev: support mulitiple " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR18MB4750392DB3F604E54800D9E7CB5F9@PH0PR18MB4750.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=hpothula@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).