patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: zhichaox.zeng@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, qiming.yang@intel.com,
	david.marchand@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	mb@smartsharesystems.com, Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] lib/eal: fix segfaults due to thread exit order
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:24:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yr2V/yvgbWB4l6xW@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615060154.6905-1-zhichaox.zeng@intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 02:01:54PM +0800, zhichaox.zeng@intel.com wrote:
> From: Zhichao Zeng <zhichaox.zeng@intel.com>
> 
> The eal-intr-thread is not closed before memory cleanup in the
> process of exiting. There is a small probability that when the
> eal-intr-thread is about to use some pointers, the memory were
> just cleaned, which cause the segment fault error caught by ASan.
> 
> This patch close the eal-intr-thread before memory cleanup when
> exiting to avoid segment fault. And add some atomic operations
> to avoid executing rte_eal_cleanup in the child process spawned
> by fork() in some test cases, e.g. debug_autotest of dpdk-test.
> 
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 

Hi,

some comments inline below.

/Bruce

> ---
> v2:
> add the same API for FreeBSD
> ---
> v3:
> fix rte_eal_cleanup crash in debug_autotest
> ---
> v4:
> shorten the prompt message and optimize the commit log
> 

Please put these updates below the cutline after the sign-offs, i.e.
immediately before the diffstat.

> Suggested-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhichao Zeng <zhichaox.zeng@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/eal/common/eal_private.h     |  7 +++++++
>  lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c            | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  lib/eal/freebsd/eal_interrupts.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  lib/eal/linux/eal.c              | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  lib/eal/linux/eal_interrupts.c   | 12 ++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_private.h b/lib/eal/common/eal_private.h
> index 44d14241f0..7adf41b7d7 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/eal_private.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_private.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,13 @@ int rte_eal_tailqs_init(void);
>   */
>  int rte_eal_intr_init(void);
>  
> +/**
> + * Destroy interrupt handling thread.
> + *
> + * This function is private to EAL.
> + */
> +void rte_eal_intr_destroy(void);
> +
>  /**
>   * Close the default log stream
>   *
> diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> index a6b20960f2..4882f27abd 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ struct lcore_config lcore_config[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
>  /* used by rte_rdtsc() */
>  int rte_cycles_vmware_tsc_map;
>  
> +/* used to judge the running status of the eal */
> +static uint32_t run_once;
>  

I don't like just moving this variable from the eal_init function. When in
eal_init the name "run_once" made sense as it tracked how often the EAL
init function was run. However, now as a global variable the name
"run_once" no longer makes sense.

Two suggestions:
1. Keep run_once in EAL init as-is, and use a different variable or value
   to indicate that DPDK is initialized for cleanup.
2. Move the variable as you have here, just rename it to a more meaningful
   name.


>  int
>  eal_clean_runtime_dir(void)
> @@ -574,12 +576,22 @@ static void rte_eal_init_alert(const char *msg)
>  	RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s\n", msg);
>  }
>  
> +static void warn_parent(void)
> +{
> +	RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, "DPDK won't work in the child process\n");
> +}

I wonder if this contains enough information. Can we identify briefly what
parts will or won't work, or if we just want to deny everything, can we
give a brief reason why?

> +
> +static void scratch_child(void)
> +{
> +	/* Scratch run_once so that a call to rte_eal_cleanup won't crash... */
> +	__atomic_store_n(&run_once, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> +}
> +

I think the name of this function needs improvement. I'm not sure that
"scratch" is the best term to use. Something like "clear_eal_flag" is
probably better.

>  /* Launch threads, called at application init(). */
>  int
>  rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>  	int i, fctret, ret;
> -	static uint32_t run_once;
>  	uint32_t has_run = 0;
>  	char cpuset[RTE_CPU_AFFINITY_STR_LEN];
>  	char thread_name[RTE_MAX_THREAD_NAME_LEN];
> @@ -883,6 +895,8 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>  	eal_mcfg_complete();
>  
> +	pthread_atfork(NULL, warn_parent, scratch_child);
> +
>  	return fctret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -891,8 +905,13 @@ rte_eal_cleanup(void)
>  {
>  	struct internal_config *internal_conf =
>  		eal_get_internal_configuration();
> +
> +	if (__atomic_load_n(&run_once, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	rte_service_finalize();
>  	rte_mp_channel_cleanup();
> +	rte_eal_intr_destroy();
>  	/* after this point, any DPDK pointers will become dangling */
>  	rte_eal_memory_detach();
>  	rte_eal_alarm_cleanup();
<snip for brevity>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-30 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220523111642.10406-1-zhichaox.zeng@intel.com>
2022-05-30 13:47 ` [PATCH v3] " zhichaox.zeng
2022-05-30 16:26   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-30 16:28   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-02  8:21     ` Zeng, ZhichaoX
2022-06-07 10:14   ` Zeng, ZhichaoX
2022-06-15  6:01   ` [PATCH v4] " zhichaox.zeng
2022-06-24  1:42     ` Zeng, ZhichaoX
2022-06-24  7:50       ` David Marchand
2022-06-30 10:38       ` Zeng, ZhichaoX
2022-06-30 12:24     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2022-09-06  2:51     ` [PATCH v5] lib/eal: fix segfaults in exiting Zhichao Zeng
2022-09-06 15:03       ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-09-07  8:53         ` Zeng, ZhichaoX
2022-10-11  5:25       ` [PATCH v6] " Zhichao Zeng
2022-10-11 14:04         ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-19  1:51           ` Zeng, ZhichaoX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yr2V/yvgbWB4l6xW@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=zhichaox.zeng@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).