DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24.03 1/8] eventdev: add capability flags for supported sched types
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:46:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVx8dbsWpLPq7Jy2@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2b85725-4886-4173-9e23-36f114314b3b@lysator.liu.se>

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:30:02AM +0100, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> On 2023-11-20 18:25, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Not all eventdev's support all scheduling types, for example, some may
> > only support atomic scheduling or others only support ordered
> > scheduling. There is currently no clear indication for each driver what
> > sched types it supports, so add capability flags to be indicated on
> > return from rte_event_dev_info_get() API.
> > 
> > Similarly add the possible scheduling types to the capabilities table in
> > the docs.
> > 
> 
> Should we allow an event device to advertise
> RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_QUEUE_ALL_TYPES, but not all of these?
> 
> With current wording of RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_QUEUE_ALL_TYPES prevents that, but
> you should be able to allow for this without breaking backward compatibility
> by tweaking the text from
> 
> "Event device is capable of enqueuing events of any type to any queue."
> 
> "Event device is capable of enqueuing events of any type advertised as
> supported (e.g., by RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_ATOMIC)."
> 
> An event device that doesn't support ordered, but does support "all" types
> seems reasonable to me, while an event device that does support ordered on a
> per-event basis, but doesn't for queue-level configuration does not.
> 
> If RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_QUEUE_ALL_TYPES is left unchanged, the user may ask
> herself what "any" means (any supported in the API, or any supported by the
> actual event device).
> 

Seems reasonable if we want to re-define this. I'm fine either way and can
add such a change to a v2 patchset if there is consensus on it.

/Bruce


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-21  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-20 17:25 [PATCH 24.03 0/8] document scheduling types for eventdev drivers Bruce Richardson
2023-11-20 17:25 ` [PATCH 24.03 1/8] eventdev: add capability flags for supported sched types Bruce Richardson
2023-11-20 17:48   ` Jerin Jacob
2023-11-20 17:52     ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21  9:30   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2023-11-21  9:46     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2023-11-21 11:12     ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 17:08       ` Pathak, Pravin
2023-11-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 24.03 2/8] event/cnxk: add schedule-type capability flags Bruce Richardson
2023-11-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 24.03 3/8] event/dlb2: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-20 22:45   ` Sevincer, Abdullah
2023-11-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 24.03 4/8] event/dpaa*: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 10:51   ` Hemant Agrawal
2023-11-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 24.03 5/8] event/dsw: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21  9:30   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2023-11-21  9:32     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2023-11-21  9:44       ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21  9:47         ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 24.03 6/8] event/octeontx: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 24.03 7/8] event/opdl: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 24.03 8/8] event/sw: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 11:54 ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 0/9] document scheduling types for eventdev drivers Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 1/9] eventdev: add capability flags for supported sched types Bruce Richardson
2023-11-23  3:59     ` Jerin Jacob
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 2/9] eventdev: increase flexibility of all-types flag Bruce Richardson
2023-11-23  4:07     ` Jerin Jacob
2023-12-12 11:28       ` Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 12:47         ` Jerin Jacob
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 3/9] event/cnxk: add schedule-type capability flags Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 4/9] event/dlb2: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 5/9] event/dpaa*: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 6/9] event/dsw: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 7/9] event/octeontx: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 8/9] event/opdl: " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-23  4:10     ` Jerin Jacob
2023-11-23  9:19       ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-23  9:38         ` Jerin Jacob
2023-11-21 11:54   ` [PATCH 24.03 v2 9/9] event/sw: " Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] document scheduling types for eventdev drivers Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 1/9] eventdev: add capability flags for supported sched types Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 2/9] eventdev: clarify all-types flag documentation Bruce Richardson
2023-12-13 12:50     ` Jerin Jacob
2023-12-13 13:20     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 3/9] event/cnxk: add schedule-type capability flags Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 4/9] event/dlb2: " Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 5/9] event/dpaa*: " Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 6/9] event/dsw: " Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 7/9] event/octeontx: " Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 8/9] event/opdl: " Bruce Richardson
2023-12-12 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 9/9] event/sw: " Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVx8dbsWpLPq7Jy2@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).