patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, jianfeng.tan@intel.com,
	santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
	thomas@monjalon.net, peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: forbid VA as IOVA mode if IOMMU address width too small
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 16:48:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a122e177-4e87-5881-69ad-648224ea82b5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180108073411.67f12201@xeon-e3>



On 01/08/2018 04:34 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon,  8 Jan 2018 14:51:27 +0100
> Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Intel VT-d supports different address widths for the IOVAs, from
>> 39 bits to 56 bits.
>>
>> While recent processors support at least 48 bits, VT-d emulation
>> currently only supports 39 bits. It makes DMA mapping to fail in this
>> case when using VA as IOVA mode, as user-space virtual addresses uses
>> up to 47 bits (see kernel's Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt).
>>
>> This patch parses VT-d CAP register value available in sysfs, and
>> forbid VA as IOVA mode if the GAW is 39 bits or unknown.
>>
>> Fixes: f37dfab21c98 ("drivers/net: enable IOVA mode for Intel PMDs")
>>
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not super happy with the patch as it does platform specific things in
>> generic code, but there are no placeholder for IOMMU/VT-d at the moment.
>>
>> As this patch is to be backported to v17.11 LTS, it cannot be a big rework.
>>
>> If you have some suggestion to improve it, please let me know.
>>
>> The fix is quite urgent, as guest device assignment with vIOMMU is broken in
>> mainline & v17.11 LTS.
>>
>> Advantage of this fix over forbidding VA as IOVA when running in emulation is
>> that VT-d emulation will soon support 48 bits, so this is future proof. Also,
>> VT-d spec supports 39 bits, so we could have physical CPUs supporting it, even
>> if I don't know any.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Maxime
> 
> You are assumming that if IOMMU is present that it is being used (ie VFIO).
> What about the case of direct access to PF device via IGB_UIO?

As soon as one device is bound to UIO or VFIO in noiomu mode, PA as IOVA
mode will be selected.

This is done in rte_pci_get_iommu_class(), by calling
pci_one_device_bound_uio() and rte_vfio_noiommu_is_enabled().

>> +static inline bool
>> +pci_one_device_iommu_support_va(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
>> +{
> 
> This is not in fast path, there is no reason it should be inline
> 

Ok, I will remove inlining in v2. I added it for consistency with the
other functions declared above.

Thanks,
Maxime

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-08 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-08 13:51 [dpdk-stable] " Maxime Coquelin
2018-01-08 15:34 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
2018-01-08 15:48   ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2018-01-08 15:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-01-08 15:54   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-01-08 16:48     ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a122e177-4e87-5881-69ad-648224ea82b5@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).