DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
To: "Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
	"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"Jacob, Jerin" <Jerin.JacobKollanukkaran@cavium.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Vangati, Narender" <narender.vangati@intel.com>,
	"Rao, Nikhil" <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] lib/cryptodev: add support to set session private data
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:56:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a23e0630-53e7-30e0-f3b6-0b437e57973c@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5612CB344B05EE4F95FC5B729939F780705FEDDD@PGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com>

Hi Abhinandan,
On 1/16/2018 12:35 PM, Gujjar, Abhinandan S wrote:
> Hi Akhil,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 11:55 AM
>> To: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>; Doherty, Declan
>> <declan.doherty@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Vangati, Narender <narender.vangati@intel.com>; Rao,
>> Nikhil <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/cryptodev: add support to set session private data
>>
>> Hi Abhinandan,
>> On 1/16/2018 11:39 AM, Gujjar, Abhinandan S wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto.h
>>>>> b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto.h
>>>>> index bbc510d..3a98cbf 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto.h
>>>>> @@ -62,6 +62,18 @@ enum rte_crypto_op_sess_type {
>>>>>     	RTE_CRYPTO_OP_SECURITY_SESSION	/**< Security session crypto
>>>> operation */
>>>>>     };
>>>>>
>>>>> +/** Private data types for cryptographic operation
>>>>> + * @see rte_crypto_op::private_data_type */ enum
>>>>> +rte_crypto_op_private_data_type {
>>>>> +	RTE_CRYPTO_OP_PRIVATE_DATA_NONE,
>>>>> +	/**< No private data */
>>>>> +	RTE_CRYPTO_OP_PRIVATE_DATA_OP,
>>>>> +	/**< Private data is part of rte_crypto_op and indicated by
>>>>> +	 * private_data_offset */
>>>>> +	RTE_CRYPTO_OP_PRIVATE_DATA_SESSION
>>>>> +	/**< Private data is available at session */ };
>>>>> +
>>>> We may get away with this enum. If private_data_offset is "0", then
>>>> we can check with the session if it has priv data or not.
>>> Right now,  Application uses 'rte_crypto_op_private_data_type' to
>>> indicate rte_cryptodev_sym_session_set_private_data()
>>> was called to set the private data. Otherwise, how do you indicate there is a
>> private data associated with the session?
>>> Any suggestions?
>> For session based flows, the first choice to store the private data should be in
>> the session. So RTE_CRYPTO_OP_WITH_SESSION or
>> RTE_CRYPTO_OP_SECURITY_SESSION can be used to call
>> rte_cryptodev_sym_session_set_private_data or
>> rte_security_session_set_private_data.
> Case 1: private_data_offset is "0" and sess_type = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_WITH_SESSION -> usual case
> Case 2: private_data_offset is "0" and sess_type = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_WITH_SESSION + event case (access private data)
> Differentiating between case 1 & 2 will be done by checking
> rte_crypto_op_private_data_type == RTE_CRYPTO_OP_PRIVATE_DATA_SESSION.

Consider this:
if (sess_type == RTE_CRYPTO_OP_WITH_SESSION &&
		rte_cryptodev_sym_session_get_private_data == NULL)
	usual case.
else if (sess_type = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_WITH_SESSION &&
		rte_cryptodev_sym_session_get_private_data != NULL)
	event case.
else if (sess_type == RTE_CRYPTO_OP_SESSIONLESS &&
		private_data_offset != 0)
	event case for sessionless op.

I hope all cases can be handled in this way.


-Akhil

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-16  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-15 11:51 Abhinandan Gujjar
2018-01-15 12:18 ` Akhil Goyal
2018-01-16  6:09   ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-01-16  6:24     ` Akhil Goyal
2018-01-16  7:05       ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-01-16  7:26         ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2018-01-16  9:03           ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-01-16  9:21             ` Akhil Goyal
2018-01-16 11:36               ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-01-16 12:00                 ` Akhil Goyal
2018-01-16 12:29                   ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-01-16 13:02                     ` Akhil Goyal
2018-01-17  6:35                       ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-01-17  9:46                         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-01-17 10:05                           ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-01-17 10:52                             ` Akhil Goyal
2018-01-18  6:52                               ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-01-22  6:51                                 ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a23e0630-53e7-30e0-f3b6-0b437e57973c@nxp.com \
    --to=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=Jerin.JacobKollanukkaran@cavium.com \
    --cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=narender.vangati@intel.com \
    --cc=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).