From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
ray.kinsella@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] flow_classify: remove eperimental tag from the API
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:47:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5e74b88-9821-a05a-5c56-6aa3054abbe6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1631718995-25427-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
s/eperimental/experimental/
On 15/09/2021 16:16, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> This API was introduced in 17.11, removing experimental tag
> to promote to stable state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h | 7 -------
> lib/flow_classify/version.map | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
The library is still listed as experimental
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h#n13
and you can remove the allow_experimental_apis from the example app now.
> diff --git a/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h b/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h
> index 82ea92b6a6..3759cd32af 100644
> --- a/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h
> +++ b/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h
> @@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ struct rte_flow_classify_ipv4_5tuple_stats {
> * @return
> * Handle to flow classifier instance on success or NULL otherwise
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> struct rte_flow_classifier *
> rte_flow_classifier_create(struct rte_flow_classifier_params *params);
>
> @@ -169,7 +168,6 @@ rte_flow_classifier_create(struct rte_flow_classifier_params *params);
> * @return
> * 0 on success, error code otherwise
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_flow_classifier_free(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls);
>
> @@ -183,7 +181,6 @@ rte_flow_classifier_free(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls);
> * @return
> * 0 on success, error code otherwise
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_flow_classify_table_create(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> struct rte_flow_classify_table_params *params);
> @@ -205,7 +202,6 @@ rte_flow_classify_table_create(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> * @return
> * 0 on success, error code otherwise
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_flow_classify_validate(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> @@ -232,7 +228,6 @@ rte_flow_classify_validate(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> * @return
> * A valid handle in case of success, NULL otherwise.
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> struct rte_flow_classify_rule *
> rte_flow_classify_table_entry_add(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> @@ -251,7 +246,6 @@ rte_flow_classify_table_entry_add(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> * @return
> * 0 on success, error code otherwise.
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_flow_classify_table_entry_delete(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> struct rte_flow_classify_rule *rule);
> @@ -273,7 +267,6 @@ rte_flow_classify_table_entry_delete(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> * @return
> * 0 on success, error code otherwise.
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_flow_classifier_query(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> diff --git a/lib/flow_classify/version.map b/lib/flow_classify/version.map
> index 49bc25c6a0..b7a888053b 100644
> --- a/lib/flow_classify/version.map
> +++ b/lib/flow_classify/version.map
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -EXPERIMENTAL {
> +DPDK_22 {
> global:
>
> rte_flow_classifier_create;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-15 15:16 Bernard Iremonger
2021-09-22 14:47 ` Kevin Traynor [this message]
2021-09-22 16:12 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2021-09-22 16:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
2021-09-23 10:09 ` Kevin Traynor
2023-06-30 21:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5e74b88-9821-a05a-5c56-6aa3054abbe6@redhat.com \
--to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ray.kinsella@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).