DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] net/tap: check if name is null
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 22:57:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a62ab8d6-c0c3-501f-a15d-a3230919e200@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f1222b5e03b5c7a396f60954686c1b569ed50f9.camel@kernel.org>

On 11/21/2022 10:03 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 22:41 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 21/11/2022 21:40, 
>> okaya@kernel.org
>>  <mailto:okaya@kernel.org>
>> :
>>> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>>> @@ -2340,6 +2340,10 @@ rte_pmd_tun_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
>>>  	struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
>>>  
>>>  	name = rte_vdev_device_name(dev);
>>> +	if (!name) {
>>
>> Please it is preferred to check against NULL,
>> because name is not a boolean, thanks.
>> I know it's longer but it is more explicit.
> 
> Sure, I can do that. Getting used to dpdk coding style. I wasn't sure
> what to do with braces on single line too. At least, I got a warning on
> that too.
> 

DPDK coding convention is documented if it helps:
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/coding_style.html

>>
>> Thanks for the fixes in this series.
>>
>>
> 
> Cheers
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-21 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 20:40 [PATCH 00/11] codeql fixes for various subsystems okaya
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 01/11] ethdev: check return result of rte_eth_dev_info_get okaya
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 02/11] net/tap: check if name is null okaya
2022-11-21 21:41   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-11-21 22:03     ` Sinan Kaya
2022-11-21 22:57       ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 03/11] memzone: check result of rte_fbarray_get okaya
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 04/11] memzone: check result of malloc_elem_from_data okaya
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 05/11] malloc: malloc_elem_join_adjacent_free can return null okaya
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 06/11] malloc: check result of rte_mem_virt2memseg_list okaya
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 07/11] malloc: check result of rte_fbarray_get okaya
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 08/11] malloc: check result of rte_mem_virt2memseg okaya
2022-11-21 20:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] malloc: check result of malloc_elem_free okaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a62ab8d6-c0c3-501f-a15d-a3230919e200@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).