DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"Feifei Wang" <feifei.wang2@arm.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>,
	"Ruifeng Wang" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] mbuf: remove the redundant code for mbuf prefree
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 10:21:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6e7bfc0745848ddbab8f51c8b4e5984@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXBI9ZGggeHC2Z_9@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>


> > > >
> > > > NAK.
> > > >
> > > > This patch is not race safe.
> > >
> > > +1, It is a bad idea.
> >
> > The patch does raise a couple of issues that could be addressed by
> > rearranging. There is duplicate code, and there are no comments
> > to explain the rationale.
> >
> > Maybe something like the following (untested):
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > index 286b32b788a5..b43c055fbe3f 100644
> > --- a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > +++ b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > @@ -1342,42 +1342,32 @@ rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> >  {
> >  	__rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0);
> >
> > -	if (likely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1)) {
> > -
> > -		if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m)) {
> > -			rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> > -			if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > -			    RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > -			    __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
> > -				return NULL;
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		if (m->next != NULL)
> > -			m->next = NULL;
> > -		if (m->nb_segs != 1)
> > -			m->nb_segs = 1;
> > -
> > -		return m;
> > -
> > -	} else if (__rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) == 0) {
> > -
> > -		if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m)) {
> > -			rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> > -			if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > -			    RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > -			    __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
> > -				return NULL;
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		if (m->next != NULL)
> > -			m->next = NULL;
> > -		if (m->nb_segs != 1)
> > -			m->nb_segs = 1;
> > +	if (likely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) != 1) ) {
> 
> == 1
> 
> > +		/* If this is the only reference to the mbuf it can just
> > +		 * be setup for reuse without modifying reference count.
> > +		 */
> > +	} else if (unlikely(__rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) == 0)) {
> > +		/* This was last reference reset to 1 for recycling/free. */
> >  		rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(m, 1);
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* mbuf is still in use */
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> >
> 
> This seems much clearer with good comments.

Then, it could be just:

/* put whatever likely/unlikely we believe would be the most common case */
if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) != 1 && __rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) != 0)
   return NULL;

/* do whatever cleanup is necessary */
 



> 
> > -		return m;
> > +	if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m)) {
> > +		rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> > +		if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > +		    RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > +		    __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
> > +
> > +		return NULL;
> >  	}
> > -	return NULL;
> > +
> > +	if (m->next != NULL)
> > +		m->next = NULL;
> > +	if (m->nb_segs != 1)
> > +		m->nb_segs = 1;
> > +	return m;
> >  }
> >
> >  /**

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-06 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-04  2:39 Feifei Wang
2023-12-04  7:41 ` Morten Brørup
2023-12-04 11:07   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-12-05 18:50     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-12-06 10:12       ` Bruce Richardson
2023-12-06 10:21         ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2023-12-05  3:13   ` Feifei Wang
2023-12-05  8:04     ` Morten Brørup
2023-12-05  9:53       ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6e7bfc0745848ddbab8f51c8b4e5984@huawei.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).