DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] kni: remove ethtool support
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:18:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af366c71-327e-4d53-6462-0bbd9c962387@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF+s_Fzhb2j+XdSysQhjiDhp0M3=1KpR5e3DjqtM2-mKJ-WSTA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/18/2019 1:07 PM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
> 
> Thanks. Should I be a maintainer to ack the patch?

No, everyone can (n)ack a patch, though maintainers have more weight.

> 
> Best regards,
> Igor
> 
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 3:33 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> <mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 2/6/2019 1:12 PM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
>     > Hi Ferruh,
>     >
>     > What's the plan with this patch?
> 
>     Hi Igor,
> 
>     I just sent a deprecation notice for this:
>     https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/50347/
> 
>     If the deprecation notice approved, requires 3 acks, note will go into 19.05
>     And later this patch can go in 19.08
> 
>     Thanks,
>     ferruh
> 
>     >
>     > Best regards,
>     > Igor
>     >
>     > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 7:55 PM Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com
>     <mailto:iryzhov@nfware.com>
>     > <mailto:iryzhov@nfware.com <mailto:iryzhov@nfware.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hi Ferruh,
>     >
>     >     I answered in another thread.
>     >
>     >     Regarding this patch – I have no objections now.
>     >
>     >     Best regards,
>     >     Igor
>     >
>     >     On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:17 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com
>     <mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>     >     <mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com <mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >         On 12/18/2018 9:20 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>     >         > On 12/18/2018 8:20 AM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
>     >         >> Hi Ferruh,
>     >         >>
>     >         >> Please, look at my patch http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/48454/ and
>     >         consider
>     >         >> rebasing your patch over mine.
>     >         >
>     >         > Sorry about that, yes I will check it today.
>     >
>     >         Hi Igor,
>     >
>     >         I put some comments on your patch.
>     >
>     >         As far as I can see it also has a target to remove current type of
>     ethtool
>     >         support, so this RFC should not be a concern to you.
>     >         All ethtool support can be removed, when you have an actual
>     solution for
>     >         driver
>     >         independent ethtool support only a little code needs to be added back.
>     >
>     >         Thanks,
>     >         ferruh
>     >
>     >         >
>     >         >>
>     >         >> As we discussed with Stephen, KNI needs to supply ethtool_ops with
>     >         >> .get_link function, to properly support link status.
>     >         >> So we should save ethtool_ops and implement .get_link using
>     standard
>     >         >> ethtool_op_get_link.
>     >         >>
>     >         >> Best regards,
>     >         >> Igor
>     >         >
>     >         >
>     >
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-18 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-18  1:25 Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-18  8:20 ` Igor Ryzhov
2018-12-18  9:20   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-18 18:17     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-05 16:55       ` Igor Ryzhov
2019-02-06 13:12         ` Igor Ryzhov
2019-02-18 12:33           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-02-18 13:07             ` Igor Ryzhov
2019-02-18 13:18               ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-05-24 16:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-24 16:46   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-24 16:46   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-24 16:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-24 19:27     ` Neil Horman
2019-05-29 21:44       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af366c71-327e-4d53-6462-0bbd9c962387@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=iryzhov@nfware.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).