From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Michael Lilja <ml@napatech.com>,
helin.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 15:43:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af6c4908-f0c0-56f0-c5ac-1583df57a2df@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517143120.18306-1-ml@napatech.com>
On 5/17/2017 3:31 PM, Michael Lilja wrote:
> Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e.
> This patch will result in an average programming time of
> 22usec with a max of 60usec .
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja <ml@napatech.com>
Sorry for multiple, minor change requests ...
>
> ---
> v7:
> * Code style changes
>
> v6:
> * Fixed code style issues
>
> v5:
> * Reinitialization of "i" inconsistent with original intent
>
> v4:
> * Code style fix
>
> v3:
> * Replaced commit message
>
> v2:
> * Code style fix
>
> v1:
> * Initial version
> ---
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> index 28cc554f5..1192d5831 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
> /* Wait count and interval for fdir filter programming */
> #define I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT 10
> #define I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US 1000
> +#define I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT (I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT * I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US)
It looks like I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT and I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US not
used anywhere else, is there any value to keep them?
why not:
#define I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT_US 10000 /* 10 ms */
>
> /* Wait count and interval for fdir filter flush */
> #define I40E_FDIR_FLUSH_RETRY 50
> @@ -1295,28 +1296,27 @@ i40e_fdir_filter_programming(struct i40e_pf *pf,
> /* Update the tx tail register */
> rte_wmb();
> I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE(txq->qtx_tail, txq->tx_tail);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT; i++) {
> - rte_delay_us(I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US);
> + for (i = 0; i < I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT; i++) {
> if ((txdp->cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) ==
> rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
> break;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> }
> - if (i >= I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT) {
> + if (i >= I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT) {
> PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to program FDIR filter:"
> " time out to get DD on tx queue.");
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
> /* totally delay 10 ms to check programming status*/
> - rte_delay_us((I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT - i) * I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US);
> - if (i40e_check_fdir_programming_status(rxq) < 0) {
> - PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to program FDIR filter:"
> - " programming status reported.");
> - return -ENOSYS;
> + for (; i < I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT; i++) {
> + if (i40e_check_fdir_programming_status(rxq) >= 0)
> + return 0;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> }
> -
> - return 0;
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to program FDIR filter:"
> + " programming status reported.");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-17 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-16 22:01 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: Improved " Michael Lilja
2017-05-17 2:22 ` Xing, Beilei
2017-05-17 8:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-17 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/i40e: improved " Michael Lilja
2017-05-17 9:39 ` Xing, Beilei
2017-05-17 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Michael Lilja
2017-05-17 10:43 ` Xing, Beilei
2017-05-17 11:21 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-17 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Michael Lilja
2017-05-17 14:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-17 14:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Michael Lilja
2017-05-17 14:43 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-05-17 14:46 ` Michael Lilja
2017-05-17 14:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-17 14:52 ` Michael Lilja
2017-05-17 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Michael Lilja
2017-05-17 15:16 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-17 15:33 ` Michael Lilja
2017-05-18 1:38 ` Xing, Beilei
2017-05-18 8:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af6c4908-f0c0-56f0-c5ac-1583df57a2df@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=ml@napatech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).