From: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>,
bruce.richardson@intel.com,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix bug in x86 cmpset
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:39:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b04df489-8d3e-bc48-a69e-0a6b3bea0669@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1919498.PKpEFfz702@xps13>
On 9/2/2017 4:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-11-06 22:09, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 2016-09-29 18:34, Thomas Monjalon:
>>> 2016-09-30 02:54, Nikhil Rao:
>>>> The original code used movl instead of xchgl, this caused
>>>> rte_atomic64_cmpset to use ebx as the lower dword of the source
>>>> to cmpxchg8b instead of the lower dword of function argument "src".
>>> Could you please start the explanation with a statement of
>>> what is wrong from an user point of view?
>>> It could help to understand how severe it is.
>> Please, we need a clear explanation of the bug, and an acknowledgement.
> Should we close this bug?
I took a few minutes to look at this, and the issue can easily be
reproduced with a small snippet of code.
With the 'mov', the lower dword of the result is incorrect. This is
resolved by using 'xchgl'.
void main()
{
uint64_t a = 0xff000000ff;
rte_atomic64_cmpset( &a, 0xff000000ff, 0xfa000000fa);
printf("0x%lx\n", a);
}
When using 'mov', the result is 0xfa00000000
When using 'xchgl', the result is 0xfa000000fa, as expected.
Rgds,
Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-29 21:24 Nikhil Rao
2016-09-29 13:05 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2016-09-29 13:16 ` Rao, Nikhil
2016-09-29 14:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-29 16:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-06 21:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-09 16:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-10 10:39 ` Hunt, David [this message]
2017-02-10 10:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-10 11:56 ` Hunt, David
2017-02-10 16:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-09 15:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-09-04 13:02 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-09-04 13:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-10-26 22:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b04df489-8d3e-bc48-a69e-0a6b3bea0669@intel.com \
--to=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).