DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Gaëtan Rivet" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] failsafe: skip devargs if not present in secondary
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 19:21:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2dca037-ab23-e5ee-1466-a2d37b371cde@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624162741.3yrlloefjvbibq7z@bidouze.vm.6wind.com>

On 6/24/2019 5:27 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:23:38AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:15:58 +0200
>> Gaëtan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Stephen,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:08:24PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>> When secondary process is run was noticing that the log always
>>>> contained complaints about unable to parse devargs.
>>>>
>>>> It turns out that an empty devargs turns into "" and this
>>>> value is not parsable. Change the failsafe secondary to just
>>>> skip doing devargs if it empty.
>>>>   
>>>
>>> Commit log needs a little rework, a few typos.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c | 4 ++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c b/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c
>>>> index e91c274d8059..04ca0cab0d78 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c
>>>> @@ -364,6 +364,10 @@ rte_pmd_failsafe_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *vdev)
>>>>  		 * A sub-device can be plugged later.
>>>>  		 */
>>>>  		FOREACH_SUBDEV(sdev, i, eth_dev) {
>>>> +			/* skip empty devargs */
>>>> +			if (sdev->devargs.name[0] == '\0')
>>>> +				continue;
>>>> +  
>>>
>>> An empty devargs being named "" is part of the internals of rte_devargs.
>>> The clean solution would be to add a `bool rte_devargs_empty()` function
>>> and test the devargs with it.
>>>
>>> The simple solution is your proposition.
>>>
>>> Clean seems a little heavy-handed, but it would be more stable. If you
>>> agree, you can add the helper. I'm ok with keeping it simple otherwise.
>>>
>>>>  			/* rebuild devargs to be able to get the bus name. */
>>>>  			ret = rte_devargs_parse(&devargs,
>>>>  						sdev->devargs.name);
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.20.1
>>>>   
>>>
>>
>> Simpler is better.
> 
> Ok

is this an ack :)

> 
>> Sorry, after working with failsafe my impression is that it is not
>> built with that in mind.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-17 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-21 22:08 Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-24  8:15 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-06-24 15:23   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-24 16:27     ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-07-17 18:21       ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-07-18 11:18         ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-07-19 12:36           ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2dca037-ab23-e5ee-1466-a2d37b371cde@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).