DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, chenbo.xia@outlook.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vhost: add IRQ suppression
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:49:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3e81400-9768-eb41-6474-e66173ebb3a9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D4D075DF-072B-46EE-A24E-E720999C8829@redhat.com>

Hi Eelco,

On 10/3/23 14:36, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> 
> 
> On 29 Sep 2023, at 12:38, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 
>> Guest notifications offloading, which has been introduced
>> in v23.07, aims at offloading syscalls out of the datapath.
>>
>> This patch optimizes the offloading by not offloading the
>> guest notification for a given virtqueue if one is already
>> being offloaded by the application.
>>
>> With a single VDUSE device, we can already see few
>> notifications being suppressed when doing throughput
>> testing with Iperf3. We can expect to see much more being
>> suppressed when the offloading thread is under pressure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks for adding this Maxime. I did some tests with OVS and my old determinism patchset, and it works perfectly.
> 
> I have two small nits, but this change looks good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
> 
>> ---
>>
>> v3: s/0/false/ (David)
>>
>>   lib/vhost/vhost.c |  4 ++++
>>   lib/vhost/vhost.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.c b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
>> index c03bb9c6eb..7fde412ef3 100644
>> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.c
>> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ static const struct vhost_vq_stats_name_off vhost_vq_stat_strings[] = {
>>   		stats.guest_notifications_offloaded)},
>>   	{"guest_notifications_error", offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue,
>>   		stats.guest_notifications_error)},
>> +	{"guest_notifications_suppressed", offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue,
>> +		stats.guest_notifications_suppressed)},
>>   	{"iotlb_hits",             offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue, stats.iotlb_hits)},
>>   	{"iotlb_misses",           offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue, stats.iotlb_misses)},
>>   	{"inflight_submitted",     offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue, stats.inflight_submitted)},
>> @@ -1517,6 +1519,8 @@ rte_vhost_notify_guest(int vid, uint16_t queue_id)
>>
>>   	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&vq->access_lock);
>>
>> +	__atomic_store_n(&vq->irq_pending, false, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>> +
>>   	if (dev->backend_ops->inject_irq(dev, vq)) {
>>   		if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_STATS_ENABLED)
>>   			__atomic_fetch_add(&vq->stats.guest_notifications_error,
>> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.h b/lib/vhost/vhost.h
>> index 9723429b1c..5fc9035a1f 100644
>> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.h
>> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.h
>> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ struct virtqueue_stats {
>>   	uint64_t iotlb_misses;
>>   	uint64_t inflight_submitted;
>>   	uint64_t inflight_completed;
>> +	uint64_t guest_notifications_suppressed;
>>   	/* Counters below are atomic, and should be incremented as such. */
>>   	uint64_t guest_notifications;
>>   	uint64_t guest_notifications_offloaded;
>> @@ -346,6 +347,8 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
>>
>>   	struct vhost_vring_addr ring_addrs;
>>   	struct virtqueue_stats	stats;
>> +
>> +	bool irq_pending;
> 
> nit: Other elements in this structure have the names aligned, not sure if this should be done for this item also.

Ha yes, you're right.
I'll fix it while applying.

> 
>>   } __rte_cache_aligned;
>>
>>   /* Virtio device status as per Virtio specification */
>> @@ -908,12 +911,24 @@ vhost_need_event(uint16_t event_idx, uint16_t new_idx, uint16_t old)
>>   static __rte_always_inline void
>>   vhost_vring_inject_irq(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>   {
>> -	if (dev->notify_ops->guest_notify &&
>> -	    dev->notify_ops->guest_notify(dev->vid, vq->index)) {
>> -		if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_STATS_ENABLED)
>> -			__atomic_fetch_add(&vq->stats.guest_notifications_offloaded,
>> -				1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>> -		return;
>> +	bool expected = false;
>> +
>> +	if (dev->notify_ops->guest_notify) {
>> +		if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&vq->irq_pending, &expected, true, 0,
>> +				  __ATOMIC_RELEASE, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
>> +			if (dev->notify_ops->guest_notify(dev->vid, vq->index)) {
>> +				if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_STATS_ENABLED)
>> +					__atomic_fetch_add(&vq->stats.guest_notifications_offloaded,
>> +						1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>> +				return;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			/* Offloading failed, fallback to direct IRQ injection */
> 
> nit: Some comments end with a dot and some do not, not sure what is the preference in DPDK.

I'm not sure either! I'm personally fine either way.

>> +			__atomic_store_n(&vq->irq_pending, false, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>> +		} else {
>> +			vq->stats.guest_notifications_suppressed++;
>> +			return;
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>
>>   	if (dev->backend_ops->inject_irq(dev, vq)) {
>> --
>> 2.41.0
> 

Thanks,
Maxime


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-03 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-29 10:38 Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-03 12:36 ` Eelco Chaudron
2023-10-03 12:49   ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2023-10-10  7:50 ` David Marchand
2023-10-12 13:49 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b3e81400-9768-eb41-6474-e66173ebb3a9@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@outlook.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).