From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/netvsc: not finding VF should not cause failure
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:49:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b991a5e3-c57c-6fb4-1b56-6eeff6341746@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181214012621.15213-4-stephen@networkplumber.org>
On 12/14/2018 1:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> It is possible that the VF device exists but DPDK doesn't know
> about it. This could happen if device was blacklisted or more
> likely the necessary device (Mellanox) was not part of the DPDK
> configuration.
>
> In either case, the right thing to do is just keep working
> but only with the slower para-virtual device.
Same question for this one, is this something that should be backported?
Is it intentionally left out from backporting?
Just a reminder, for backport, a patch needs a few markers,
- fix patch with fixes line
- Cc: stable@dpdk.org line
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/netvsc/hn_ethdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_ethdev.c
> index de872212d3f3..1f7a7e66a51b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_ethdev.c
> @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ eth_hn_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>
> err = hn_vf_add(eth_dev, hv);
> if (err)
> - goto failed;
> + hv->vf_present = 0;
> }
>
> return 0;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-17 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-14 1:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/netvsc: misc fixes Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-14 1:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/netvsc: support receive without vlan strip Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-14 16:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-14 16:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-17 10:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-14 1:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/netvsc: cleanup transmit descriptor pool Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-17 10:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-17 22:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-14 1:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/netvsc: not finding VF should not cause failure Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-17 10:49 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
[not found] ` <DM5PR21MB0698C89DE76C533F41190931CCBC0@DM5PR21MB0698.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
2018-12-17 22:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-17 22:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-17 22:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/netvsc: misc fixes Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-18 6:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b991a5e3-c57c-6fb4-1b56-6eeff6341746@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).