DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] ethdev: add sanity checks in control APIs
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:15:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9b84f59-686f-bc1b-89a0-c914bcfae4a1@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1618447925-12168-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com>

On 4/15/21 3:52 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> This patch adds more sanity checks in control path APIs.
> 
> Fixes: 214ed1acd125 ("ethdev: add iterator to match devargs input")
> Fixes: 3d98f921fbe9 ("ethdev: unify prefix for static functions and variables")
> Fixes: 0366137722a0 ("ethdev: check for invalid device name")
> Fixes: d948f596fee2 ("ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process model")
> Fixes: 5b7ba31148a8 ("ethdev: add port ownership")
> Fixes: f8244c6399d9 ("ethdev: increase port id range")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Many thanks. I'll keep log messages gramma review to native
speekers. Content looks good to me.

One minor issue below lost on previous review.

Other than that,

Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>

[snip]

> @@ -1299,6 +1337,12 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>  
>  	RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
>  
> +	if (dev_conf == NULL) {
> +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to configure ethdev port %u to NULL\n",
> +			port_id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];

I think it is better to keep:
    RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
    dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
together since they are tightly related. I.e. I'd even remove
empty line between them when it is present and add args
sanity check after the dev assignment.
     >
>  	RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->dev_configure, -ENOTSUP);

In theory, the first argument is sufficient to make the ops
check, but I think it is the right solution to keep it as is
since current tendency is to check operation support when
driver callback is really required and we're going to use it.
However, if we do it just after port_id check, we'll have a
way to check for callback support without any side effects
if we provide invalid argument value. I.e. if -ENOTSUP is
returned, callback is not supported, if -EINVAL, callback is
supported (but argument is invalid and nothing done).
However, it looks a bit fragile and not always possible.
Thoughts on it are welcome.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-10  9:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-12 23:08 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-13  3:23   ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-13  3:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-13  8:44   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-13  8:58     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-13  9:24       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-14 11:12     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29 17:48   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-04-29 18:18     ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-14 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-14 12:00   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-15  0:52     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-15  0:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-15  8:15   ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2021-04-15 11:09     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-15 11:57     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-15 12:03       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-15 12:20         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-15 12:43           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-15 12:04   ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-15 12:15     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16  7:01       ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-16  7:00     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-16 10:09       ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-16 10:44         ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-15 11:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-15 15:38   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-16  7:02     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-16 16:19     ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-15 15:45   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-15 16:21     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16  7:04       ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-16 16:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-16  6:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-16 10:22   ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-16 11:00     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-16 16:28     ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-17  0:28       ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-17 21:37         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19  0:34           ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-17  7:42       ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-16 11:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-16 11:31   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-16 12:02   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-17  7:39     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-17  7:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-20 10:04   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-20 13:59     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-20 14:20     ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-20 14:33       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-21  2:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 10:48     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-21 11:28     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-21 12:36       ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 12:38       ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 13:19       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 13:40         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 13:50           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-21 13:50         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-21 14:17       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 12:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 14:19   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 16:22     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 17:16       ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b9b84f59-686f-bc1b-89a0-c914bcfae4a1@oktetlabs.ru \
    --to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=humin29@huawei.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).