DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
To: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce ABI change for rte_eth_dev structure
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 11:10:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb84238a-4782-c69a-7570-408a73a91bfd@cloudius-systems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5157f7a-fc76-4ffb-a60f-b8d8711b5dbb@cloudius-systems.com>



On 07/31/2016 10:46 AM, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>
>
> On 07/20/2016 05:24 PM, Tomasz Kulasek wrote:
>> This is an ABI deprecation notice for DPDK 16.11 in librte_ether about
>> changes in rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_desc_lim structures.
>>
>> In 16.11, we plan to introduce rte_eth_tx_prep() function to do
>> necessary preparations of packet burst to be safely transmitted on
>> device for desired HW offloads (set/reset checksum field according to
>> the hardware requirements) and check HW constraints (number of segments
>> per packet, etc).
>>
>> While the limitations and requirements may differ for devices, it
>> requires to extend rte_eth_dev structure with new function pointer
>> "tx_pkt_prep" which can be implemented in the driver to prepare and
>> verify packets, in devices specific way, before burst, what should to
>> prevent application to send malformed packets.
>>
>> Also new fields will be introduced in rte_eth_desc_lim: nb_seg_max and
>> nb_mtu_seg_max, providing an information about max segments in TSO and
>> non TSO packets acceptable by device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@scylladb.com>

One small comment however.
Although this function is a must we need a way to clearly understand 
which one the clusters are malformed since dropping the whole bulk is 
usually not an option and sending the malformed packets anyway may cause 
a HW hang, thus not an option as well.
Another thing - I've pulled the current master and I couldn't find the 
way an application may query the mentioned Tx offload HW limitation, 
e.g. maximum number of segments.
Knowing this limitation would avoid extra liniarization.

thanks,
vlad

>
>> ---
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst |    7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst 
>> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> index f502f86..485aacb 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> @@ -41,3 +41,10 @@ Deprecation Notices
>>   * The mempool functions for single/multi producer/consumer are 
>> deprecated and
>>     will be removed in 16.11.
>>     It is replaced by rte_mempool_generic_get/put functions.
>> +
>> +* In 16.11 ABI changes are plained: the ``rte_eth_dev`` structure 
>> will be
>> +  extended with new function pointer ``tx_pkt_prep`` allowing 
>> verification
>> +  and processing of packet burst to meet HW specific requirements 
>> before
>> +  transmit. Also new fields will be added to the 
>> ``rte_eth_desc_lim`` structure:
>> +  ``nb_seg_max`` and ``nb_mtu_seg_max`` provideing information about 
>> number of
>> +  segments limit to be transmitted by device for TSO/non-TSO packets.
>

      reply	other threads:[~2016-07-31  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-20 14:24 Tomasz Kulasek
2016-07-20 15:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-20 15:13   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-20 15:22     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-20 15:42       ` Kulasek, TomaszX
2016-07-21 15:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Tomasz Kulasek
2016-07-21 22:48   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-27  8:59     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-27 17:10       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-27 17:33         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-27 17:41           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-27 20:51             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-28  2:13               ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-28 10:36                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-28 11:38                   ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-28 12:07                     ` Avi Kivity
2016-07-28 13:01                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-28 13:58                       ` Olivier MATZ
2016-07-28 14:21                         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-28 13:59                       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-28 14:52                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-28 16:25                           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-28 17:07                             ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-31  7:50     ` Vlad Zolotarov
2016-07-28 12:04   ` Avi Kivity
2016-07-31  7:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Vlad Zolotarov
2016-07-31  8:10   ` Vlad Zolotarov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb84238a-4782-c69a-7570-408a73a91bfd@cloudius-systems.com \
    --to=vladz@cloudius-systems.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).