DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.pfeiffer@tu-ilmenau.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Theil <markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de>,
	dev@dpdk.org, Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: expose lcore pthread id
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:03:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c101067e3008f753e124cfe3c89576576bcce97d.camel@tu-ilmenau.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020083605.274c43f2@hermes.local>

On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 08:36 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:20:40 +0200
> David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:54 AM Markus Theil <markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de>
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.pfeiffer@tu-ilmenau.de>
> > > 
> > > Also expose the pthread id of each lcore, in
> > > order to allow modification of pthread attributes,
> > > for example use rte_thread_setname without executing
> > > pthread_self() on the maybe already running lcore.
> > > 
> > > The rte_lcore_to_thread_id function is added to API.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.pfeiffer@tu-ilmenau.de>  
> > 
> > We are trying to abstract the use of pthread in DPDK API.
> > So I don't think this patch is going in the right direction.
> 
> Agree, exposing this will make Windows support harder
> and who knows what next OS to come will need.

Hi,
thanks for your feedback. I understand your concerns regarding abstraction and
portability.

Markus and I ultimately use the function in the patch to call
rte_thread_setname() (which takes the pthread id as an argument) to rename our
lcore workers from "lcore-worker-X" to something more meaningful in the scope
of our application. Having descriptive thread names makes debugging
significantly easier. For example, verifying CPU pinning worked as intended
with ps -T ..., or identifying threads in the Intel VTune profiler.

Would you consider something like
- int rte_lcore_setname(unsigned int lcore_id, const char *name)
- int rte_lcore_getname(unsigned int lcore_id, char *name, size_t len)
a more appropriate API? That would still allow us to set names from the main
lcore, but would not expose any pthread internals.

Thanks & regards
Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14  6:20 [PATCH " Markus Theil
2022-10-14  6:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] eal: prevent OOB read in rte_lcore_to_socket_id Markus Theil
2022-10-14  7:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: expose lcore pthread id Markus Theil
2022-10-14  7:54   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: prevent OOB read in rte_lcore_to_socket_id Markus Theil
2022-10-20 11:20   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: expose lcore pthread id David Marchand
2022-10-20 15:36     ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-20 20:03       ` Michael Pfeiffer [this message]
2022-11-29 22:04         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-07-06  2:57           ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-06  5:50             ` Michael Pfeiffer
2022-11-12  0:34       ` Tyler Retzlaff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c101067e3008f753e124cfe3c89576576bcce97d.camel@tu-ilmenau.de \
    --to=michael.pfeiffer@tu-ilmenau.de \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).