From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, thomas@monjalon.net
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] NXP DPAA2: Refactor bus scan/probe code
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:06:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cac5f970-0a4e-14ca-9866-885e9e4c4a73@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170825101954.28124-1-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
On 8/25/2017 11:19 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Change Log:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~
> v2:
> - Minor updates for logging (removed some logs and changed others
> to make it cleaner when application starts)
>
> Brief:
> ~~~~~~
>
> -- v1 is at [3] --
>
> In [1], during the IOVA Mapping patch set [2] discussion, it was
> observed that DPAA2 scan was actually doing work meant for probing.
>
> This patchset demarcates the roles of FSLMC bus scan and probe
> functions much more clearly than before:
>
> 1. scan now only add devices into a list
> unlike previously, scan doesn't initialize the devices using the VFIO
> operations. Now, scan would only add the devices onto a local device
> list after marking their type and filling in device name.
>
> 2. probe would now perform VFIO operations
> in dpaa2, for the device added in list, an initialization needs
> to be done so as to enable the devices - before actually API calls
> can be served. Probe function now initializes the devices as well
> as links then to the Eth/Crypto drivers.
>
> 3. Refactoring some VFIO code
> This patch improves the overall code contained within DPAA2 bus
> for DPAA2 VFIO layer.
>
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-July/071270.html
> [2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-July/070833.html
> [3] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/073011.html
>
> Shreyansh Jain (6):
> bus/fslmc: support only single group and container
> bus/fslmc: introduce new device type enumerator
> crypto/dpaa2_sec: update driver type field
> net/dpaa2: update driver type field
> drivers: refactor DPAA2 object definition
> bus/fslmc: refactor scan and probe functions
Series Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
I guess this set needs to go in to the main tree, because of both
- as far as I get IOVA patchset breaks dpaa2, so this should go in
before that patchset
- This patchset has both crypto and net patches, hard to get by sub-trees
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-11 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 12:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-18 12:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] bus/fslmc: support only single group and container Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-18 12:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] bus/fslmc: introduce new device type enumerator Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-18 12:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] net/dpaa2: update driver type field Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-18 12:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] crypto/dpaa2_sec: " Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-18 12:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] drivers: refactor DPAA2 object definition Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-18 12:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] bus/fslmc: refactor scan and probe functions Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-25 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] NXP DPAA2: Refactor bus scan/probe code Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-25 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] bus/fslmc: support only single group and container Shreyansh Jain
2017-09-18 11:15 ` santosh
2017-08-25 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] bus/fslmc: introduce new device type enumerator Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-25 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] crypto/dpaa2_sec: update driver type field Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-25 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] net/dpaa2: " Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-25 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] drivers: refactor DPAA2 object definition Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-25 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] bus/fslmc: refactor scan and probe functions Shreyansh Jain
2017-09-11 14:06 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-09-11 14:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] NXP DPAA2: Refactor bus scan/probe code Shreyansh Jain
2017-09-25 7:07 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-09-18 14:36 ` santosh
2017-10-05 23:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cac5f970-0a4e-14ca-9866-885e9e4c4a73@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).