DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Christensen <fc@napatech.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>,
	Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
	"Kevin Traynor" <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] standardize device identification
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 07:52:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdaa0102074d4b15afe5be06ed577192@napatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7044959.u7szEIarlR@xps>

    -----Original Message-----
    From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
    Monjalon
    Sent: 20. december 2017 23:03
    To: dev@dpdk.org
    Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>; Adrien Mazarguil
    <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>;
    Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; stephen@networkplumber.org;
    ferruh.yigit@intel.com
    Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] standardize device identification
    
    Changing the title and adding more comments inline:
    
    19/12/2017 00:05, Thomas Monjalon:
    > Let's summarize and resume this thread.
    >
    > We need a generic syntax to describe a device.
    > This syntax can be used
    > 	- before initializing the device (i.e. whitelist/blacklist)
    > 	- or after the initialization (e.g. user config)
    >
    > We need to answer 4 questions:
    > 1/ what are the separators (comma, colon, etc)?
    > 2/ how to distinguish a device identification from a configuration?
    > 3/ what are the mandatory parts?
    > 4/ what can be the optional properties?
    >
    > 30/11/2017 08:35, Yuanhan Liu:
    > > What this patch proposes is to use "name[,mac]" syntax. "name" is
    > > the PCI id for pci device. For vdev, it's the vdev name given by
    > > user. The reason "mac" is needed is for some devices (say
    > > ConnectX-3), 2 ports (in a single NIC) have the same PCI id.
    >
    > Based on the feedbacks we had, I suggest a syntax where everything is
    > optional key/value pairs, and split in 3 categories:
    > 	- bus (pci, vdev, vmbus, fslmc, etc)
    > 	- class (eth, crypto)
    > 	- driver (i40e, mlx5, virtio, etc)
    
    The key/value pair describing the category scope is mandatory and must
    be the first pair in the category properties.
    Example: bus=pci, must be placed before id=0000:01:00.0
    
    > Between categories, the separator is a slash.
    > Inside a category, the separator is a comma.
    > Inside a key/value pair, the separator is an equal sign.
    >
    > It may look like this:
    >
    bus=BUS_NAME,id=BUS_ID/class=CLASS_NAME,dev_port=PORT_NUM,m
    ac=MAC_ADDR
    > ESS/driver=DRIVER_NAME,driverspecificproperty=VALUE
    >
    > A device is identified when every properties are matched.
    > Before device is probed, only the bus category is relevant.
    > For the simple PCI whitelist, it means moving from
    > 	-w 0000:01:00.0
    > to
    > 	-w bus=pci,id=0000:01:00.0
    >
    > It is possible to mix some settings in these devargs syntax if the
    > keys are differents. Example: mac= is for identification by MAC,
    > whereas newmac= would be for specifying a MAC address to set.
    >
    > Agreement?
    
 
We also need to distinguish between multiple ports sitting on same PCI bus ID.
and from our point of view, this will fully cover our needs.
Thanks - great proposal.

Regards,
Finn Christensen, Napatech


    Yuanhan is proposing to use this syntax in OVS option dpdk-devargs:
    https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-
    December/342273.html
    
    Please, any feedback or approval that this syntax is good?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-05  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30  7:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ether: standardize getting the port by name Yuanhan Liu
2017-11-30 17:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-30 17:35   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-30 21:21     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-30 21:44       ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-01  9:47         ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-04 13:55           ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-12-05 11:04             ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-12-05 13:20               ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-05 13:58                 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-12-05 15:28                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-05 17:22                     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-12-06 15:49                       ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-12-18 22:25                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-18 22:30                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-18 22:41                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-18 23:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-20 22:02   ` [dpdk-dev] standardize device identification Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-22  7:01     ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-12-22  9:00       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05  7:52     ` Finn Christensen [this message]
2018-01-05  8:39       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05 11:09         ` Finn Christensen
2018-01-05 12:01           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05 14:14             ` Finn Christensen
2018-01-05 15:34               ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05 20:32                 ` Finn Christensen
2018-01-16 20:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ether: standardize getting the port by name Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cdaa0102074d4b15afe5be06ed577192@napatech.com \
    --to=fc@napatech.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).