From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <ci-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D20A00E6 for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2B41BC15; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D1B1BC13 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90F027CA2; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:55:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=aZW6+b0rn3gN4zEAszE7GIOAdbK/KRSsqApuS4d2RgI=; b=exqMEq1KFX+Q W/xtR383Zxd1E5OyandWG/FuZmgIi7+sZv4q2YCHrKv2Gxi675/FcEdhONd7f1WZ 9pwYQ8tyiHBBnEZcXRzwgVZeR+Zy1Oee3NWHUwciETddNpD7xa96E+RZsjPFM6z5 zxdx3couKN+j8mn/Iea54U5xqCbCZg0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=aZW6+b0rn3gN4zEAszE7GIOAdbK/KRSsqApuS4d2R gI=; b=C1AIL9HLn1mPxlzjnZdWYlZec8HoWGvkCQlb7KQ9/u5kjpUyQCya/kwfB Xzs95TE+veSWbnWpGyJf7G3zuPk3fnf3F+G5t9oKB2RSvNFsgzzyueFRwpYP2TfU sS4splyAt+EKayRZYwkurXSYhr581F7pVcJVRg77fUnbhW9TS5z7YMW2FkHfcQ27 DA1PXu8Je320xoBG1eLThsFPmiXhriNQTmBga/DlW6GADz/nfYkLiofXHLY+7evN 5A9vU/Ly8i9G8nwTrn38Bka7Ewg49qPIUsB6EgJ9GFsJBjASK/riF7BojqGJZAlc B8PttrB4ppWtHOcymzp/Wz4OIqxWg== X-ME-Sender: <xms:oQu6XMAAH5IbOkeiRpLq_C294m4I24cv0JlugFxOoxOv0DRXt9E3_g> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrfeekgddujecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:oQu6XEgjyMEpIJYcYN3XU-rEf4KOde2JXQ0LhYsZUHycT5F5J-Egig> <xmx:oQu6XMCeRvu3q2cJ3b1EMQeUVlvkTG5tOvs__Lwi4C7swKdJdXE8Ig> <xmx:oQu6XIU4H72aSjiPh6yMiOvwF1xttcM5h3pXhx5gs2Eu9DLG0J5-EQ> <xmx:ogu6XH_mOL_o2BGvt-p-azMOObofKD8zfcBUPRkZJuyI4JFskBLY4A> Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D25B3E4382; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:55:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: Jeremy Plsek <jplsek@iol.unh.edu> Cc: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com>, "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:55:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1669577.NWkuDTEeDI@xps> In-Reply-To: <CA+xUZB4OdmRDmVsTGr1mprJz5TwXakC+1uGp_CuhcmadPz4ZEA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20190216160206.11957-1-alialnu@mellanox.com> <2149176.42v1TqmSes@xps> <CA+xUZB4OdmRDmVsTGr1mprJz5TwXakC+1uGp_CuhcmadPz4ZEA@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4] add script to decide best tree match for patches X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/> List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" <ci-bounces@dpdk.org> 19/04/2019 19:33, Jeremy Plsek: > I thinks so. Only more patchsets will tell, but that could be improved > after the fact. So I think it's fine to merge it in. > > At first glance, the only part that I don't think is implemented is > mentioned here: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166#c35 > > We must match the common prefix of the git trees. > > Examples: > > dpdk-next-net-intel + dpdk = dpdk > > dpdk-next-net-intel + dpdk-next-net-mlx = dpdk-next-net > Since some of the patches are being set to dpdk-next-net-mlx instead > of dpdk-next-net. But I'm fine with how it is right now and wouldn't > mind it getting changed to this later on. It is supposed to be fixed. Please could you give an example of a misbehaviour? PS: please avoid top-post, it is making thread hard to read. > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:24 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > > 19/04/2019 18:21, Jeremy Plsek: > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 4:16 AM Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com> wrote: > > > > Did you guys get a chance to test this version? > > > > > > We've switched to using it a few days ago. > > > Some examples of it switching branches: > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5503/ > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5499/ > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5498/ > > > > Is it working as you expect? > > May I merge it in dpdk-ci?