From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F93A0548 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB3041749; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA7D41735; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:37:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907B15C0370; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:37:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:37:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= 8Pl/rQTv3y/veKHKiLtZ1MwTeR56Yk3+e7NhIpTlJEI=; b=e6+vU/de8yZFmFZc eqPp61snCM/cK9toPMRWUfLn/nLAnYlkNpwLFCT6fLhkzAzG8KdWchNycvQ8Pu+o 1CKBi/IEt+LeU6+4KmwXaPqvKnthtgaJR3hETNdnpvye3m8WI3vrDCy8gq4C+VJr 1HjAaRyLPwrvnGLjt6gDtEcCKMeWGTeBJe4NPW8uACbDkcqzarSJIVPVoWjzN16M nSQTeNNGk32WBteQkq+UhGTH+o0H93FmTR1/16Gpgob+WhpZffRCsXKhm3CtBw6+ oXDlr8cLc04FCyrW4suLIzR6F/oWyXvXFBafgRhn2ih/WeENr7PP8JPmdTIlE0kp MpKTbg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=8Pl/rQTv3y/veKHKiLtZ1MwTeR56Yk3+e7NhIpTlJ EI=; b=qWB0mOl8GDZmbVLUZ0KPRtrJMRZGoiUyOYRSqtcT9jRQBNhlJupbCF09b W+WByftqOjdhvIYX9z+DZzIMucClYm7cEzPkTUuTwExSIFHxIZMpvSCUOTGJRSmr 6bxCEtMy59AK/rxokppPz9pXe1OgmmGWBnlBndBc5VuUCpeK9UyvWQKamteqMdus LLE3STisF4XDnBkgn3J7KC1VDWkqwNzHgb2Hjn6Y74TphQXi91XQsCU6rvH/B67Y QGzhEqxVhwiY8JepKC0CB43vwYisRGHqm1fUAE7WJw5jsr1kzuBWvQppWg8Texul 2561L8cFcQqj517k7CgpAlNPjbC4Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtiedgledvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BEF2C108006B; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:37:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Brandon Lo Cc: dev , ci@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:37:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1717688.4SEbdfRPfx@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] UNH-IOL ABI Failures X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 20/04/2021 17:30, Brandon Lo: > Hi all, > > We have noticed some failures occurring repeatedly in our CI system > regarding the ABI test. > > I looked into the failures and saw that there were some failures > caused by a clock skew issue on the ARM ABI test. > Those failures have been rerun and the report will be resent to > patchworks for the updated result. > > However, the earlier test runs seem to report an actual failure: > > "1 function with some indirect sub-type change: > > [C]'function rte_security_session* > rte_security_session_create(rte_security_ctx*, > rte_security_session_conf*, rte_mempool*, rte_mempool*)' at > rte_security.c:43:1 has some indirect sub-type changes: > parameter 2 of type 'rte_security_session_conf*' has sub-type changes: > in pointed to type 'struct rte_security_session_conf' at > rte_security.h:366:1: > type size hasn't changed > 1 data member change: > type of 'rte_crypto_sym_xform* > rte_security_session_conf::crypto_xform' changed: > in pointed to type 'struct rte_crypto_sym_xform' at > rte_crypto_sym.h:575:1: > type size hasn't changed > 1 data member changes (1 filtered): > > Error: ABI issue reported for 'abidiff --suppr > dpdk/devtools/libabigail.abignore --no-added-syms --headers-dir1 > reference/usr/local/include --headers-dir2 build/usr/local/include > reference/dump/librte_security.dump build/dump/librte_security.dump' > > ABIDIFF_ABI_CHANGE, this change requires a review (abidiff flagged > this as a potential issue)." > > Can anyone please confirm that this is a real ABI issue or if this > requires a change on the UNH-IOL side. It requires libabigail 1.8 on UNH-IOL side.