From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com (mail-wr0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.128.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346E558CF
 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:59:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id i10so145855599wrb.0
 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:59:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=KpodwrczGaLK6MVY/rnFW1fzsTFLfqJGhHTLj2DHtR8=;
 b=xiQKk1nVSXYnNg2EWBhwbAnNmVU+Q/JO8zte/X09RLXR0aS8JSLNQBjXB1clBpL4Xa
 5Qo+EeLgxUpvamDg1vp2Zos8qz8B46yjszxO4TjmNZ/ZlAwNAvjUVwLZmJGfzJfLJObu
 MMm+wYsvm33ObbHEeiyGZj1VfeKnoFqVJsyeBdejxZP14PITKLD4agxXcWRLFcxD6h3p
 F0ZBZdXZ3ES8SJXwbXwLtyAxOqm01IkbBy4nwquvhw8Yvx10usOG4eI7QXTZSmUoK51Z
 IZZknYfp0e5t7C2mZEu4MVmb2AKG744iN+ZaIX6oTik42xTxinOg6q4KnTuDN+kITWOx
 ejjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=KpodwrczGaLK6MVY/rnFW1fzsTFLfqJGhHTLj2DHtR8=;
 b=X/68Wuktz/mj5h1zWr69paMD1u5fqBfeb4iW7xYNlCJc4HIZwy+jynoIcMfYteq7+r
 lGUlblDjBBgLUKXNqYaV6g6qhJKiMvdFzj0bx6mCMCeFo3H5nE16PL8ucetuXxj43GG2
 dtLz+TJBsF4YTWoLhCQfX/ljEsQvAGjTzKPHlCc6mmzzz5O8rKrZVG8CTImpYrLDu7Dt
 jH2qDNODIspKdXrahv4xhwdIZa5IIKQ6LLz6/8yIGJoQYTXSJUElUSakBkY++FgvMzGh
 NtH3ZALhIEjXKAmJ1VVQGw0ULThqQJTR7NZe9oUqxNT4H/Y1NXL9kPcDZzp12FqFqnGZ
 y8Bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kp0dDGMskNwmLgU0Mklbz18F3nd3n0ySy/9ZjoDkPtMBEJWGElhtVk0MZ7HE5PyEhb
X-Received: by 10.223.147.1 with SMTP id 1mr18047796wro.60.1486976375740;
 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:59:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l37sm12953297wrc.41.2017.02.13.00.59.34
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:59:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Wei, FangfangX" <fangfangx.wei@intel.com>
Cc: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>, ci@dpdk.org
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:59:33 +0100
Message-ID: <1806668.usxBFJDS7m@xps13>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346EA043B6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1762667.L2bTNXicYI@xps13>
 <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346EA043B6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Fwd: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test-crypto-perf:
	fix	compilation under FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/ci>,
 <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/ci/>
List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/ci>,
 <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:59:36 -0000

2017-02-13 02:18, Wei, FangfangX:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > There was (unfortunately) a compilation failure on FreeBSD.
> > I think that in such a case, the FreeBSD compilation must be skippe=
d in
> > the automatic compilation tests. Or ideally it should not be consid=
ered
> > as a failure when testing a new patch, considering the failure was
> > already there.
> >=20
> > Now that it is fixed in the mainline, would it be possible to re-ru=
n the
> > tests for the recent pending patches? Note that the patchwork resul=
t will
> > be updated when sending a new report for the same patch with the sa=
me
> > test label.
> =20
> Hi Thomas,
> I find that the states of patches are RFC, Accepted, Changes Requeste=
d,
> Deferred, Superseded and New. I plan to re-run the patch=EF=BC=8C the=
 state of
> which is New. Is that OK?

Please, could you re-run also the tests for the Deferred?
They will be New when 17.02 is released.