From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net> Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55761B48B for <ci@dpdk.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 17:19:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D661432; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:19:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Jan 2019 11:19:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=A0Aooyqute3FwMs4O00YJfkbDtnsv80vK0NAxLPPQJA=; b=WNddpVVNpSyy /gOobVMts2zq+bj/hGMUm1vCBLPhQwfKDRxqtBjnv7AllFHWPMKk3Lpk0vpWfFiG YGdJXxSFQKio3qDIpsyTfMtQ9n5P05dd6dbETvcWBMabTtAPpr7is1PseZTn+qyx Oe/DHWIJvawqiNDQOs/pitRNqQCt9z0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=A0Aooyqute3FwMs4O00YJfkbDtnsv80vK0NAxLPPQ JA=; b=w4ymzydbFohE62JVHW3yrqLI2VpFncbQNCU9+Gd3YV27rQ88gfxU9d0EN STrqwFFL0xwsvyJ+FuXbEdDXmYe2mfzOH6em5yQMwiba+VUUPqDJwx+8rX1/qJzV Z7Ug9TP++AKDkTrAQaOeIS0k7une+JVf6UfcQ5lnjRcnyb1R/L1AOAGIcjCKKUOD g+l+yRz7xLSqty4QURDSvED3uXzDSsO+JYnlFGzPmQirSfpVeS9yHEKqUyiOpPjz WlWHWxaohbFEZ3LD0PXD8jlz7r/btZYlHFwJ7BHr/kzNUgFo2S+W3TKk0067+ED6 4V5gH2dP999pcJFd2S92LSUsGVnJg== X-ME-Sender: <xms:nocvXH6IdJsaIq-aEd03j5zsl8aJI-p4TxD4OTa2WbSlPgNx3i-wXA> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrvddugdekleculddtuddrgedtkedrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:nocvXP9crAI1Nwk1e-hJKcANoqyGDJoLHYWIkUAimeL9z_UUht1z1Q> <xmx:nocvXMjWIM-OBIij_H2MoT57N4icPg_N0In7iFIKxJUYredygr5RiQ> <xmx:nocvXLljm8hgnNHheVEW5zE7BoKixn9b5iVPOWVyuCWfRbuRNqJkKA> <xmx:nocvXOaciaYN1nhTyQPEH89j1CeM7wGkP9KykQvNPcooEW9eTaI9-w> Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E398DE4147; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:19:41 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: Jeremy Plsek <jplsek@iol.unh.edu> Cc: Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com>, ci@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:19:40 +0100 Message-ID: <2700091.eHxhcu6V5n@xps> In-Reply-To: <CA+xUZB7WjTQ7aiGmrVPVXaYV9ZNEeUcHwk-HFLOHb1JU02P2zA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHLOa7TnitO=wrB69B3b8BEvrV_va1pXrAGwUe+0euioQy1PZQ@mail.gmail.com> <2631230.hnArF6gTu5@xps> <CA+xUZB7WjTQ7aiGmrVPVXaYV9ZNEeUcHwk-HFLOHb1JU02P2zA@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Question about performance test X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/> List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 16:19:44 -0000 04/01/2019 17:15, Jeremy Plsek: > > Do you plan to add such URL in the report sent to patchwork? > > Created a ticket to add the URL to the emailed reports: > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180 > > > Instead of filtering based on the label, you could filter based on > > the paths of modified files. > > Note that such filter depends on the test you run, > > because you could also test the doc syntax in the CI. > > Okay, so if a series only modified the doc folder, then don't include it > for performance tests. Later on, we can introduce syntax checking for > documentation when we introduce more unit testing / functional testing. > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 Yes, thank you