From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C918BA04DC for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA669BBF6; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4BD5AB6 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:34:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDDAB43; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:34:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= oD5gAyCa9GVO8yMxBrgIWgaARespOk3EkVrYpGHCd4Y=; b=iUI2jLvLcbQLgvgD JQNk8KWUVYg9+JsGfp/3xR8fh+c+sYx9CPaKilvHUr7ej+KvH8SD2AVYGJzDf05Q 3XxnJWDOJ0EUPIviqyHkw+rqRLXKESlil9Jzcw4nfjH/v3AFBmXWhpNcs4xW5IMH UHm5rpUqgzca/qJGjUHZBDVf5460hb018qVXzHDwsvJDc3IZQf7z5P6segcABnw3 LXMLnVaQDzvcSnJnl6KO06dAo91az/kOq2p3onKNC7UWtIy+zTRXxkszEBRIr0Sj VYIw/UHyM1FNWgJzciqU/xnM6vpZt94707XpctE+0zzJbibgli8sbGyFUoCW0I// xewqvA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=oD5gAyCa9GVO8yMxBrgIWgaARespOk3EkVrYpGHCd 4Y=; b=UdyEkINnq4uayT3H+w68hCXKEoE5t3VCv/O24wgyA2H+4ihqTH1pNvQq3 blq1SGmNQ04C514d3luWFOdTUAFv9SPWFrF7nbKIyXzJpZJCCmEy3SyYTUk8ugHY HbpBOraXQmGc82QOu+CmNMQCXddNScJneF2TG28QLSu4MXepwgiMdgKq5eu0j5St HjyLki0w8cCCozhgbHeodSWnqm7ZeUpgu/skQgbgZ+vnaAx+09+Rz7ZhyeQjuccZ Lbg26NGNTOsgZ9++XlneeR2kgZXBdt6ArovE1KOQUT33YifsyYWiBnqCVLv4n6pa D63yMc5r2syvhNP8ZqIpv3DX2NPzQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrjeefgdehvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4F79D3280064; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:34:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Brandon Lo Cc: ci@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:34:33 +0200 Message-ID: <320640640.vBkTyhWo6Z@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 20/10/2020 14:31, Brandon Lo: > Hi everyone, > > Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK? > > Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile > DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is > not building testpmd. > We are also using the latest commit available for DTS. No testpmd should be built.