From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6F6A04B8 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:43:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38731D66D; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:43:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4C81D669 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:43:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 045G3TpO191156 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 12:43:38 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30twhxah06-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:43:38 -0400 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 045G4C34196469 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 12:43:38 -0400 Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30twhxagyq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 May 2020 12:43:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 045Ga4M6010967; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:43:37 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30s0g6gtx9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 May 2020 16:43:37 +0000 Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.234]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 045GhZfd46268854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 May 2020 16:43:35 GMT Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AD56A051; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:43:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA97B6A04D; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:43:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltc.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.16.170.189]) by b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:43:35 +0000 (GMT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 09:43:35 -0700 From: dwilder To: Aaron Conole Cc: David Christensen , ci@dpdk.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3dcdd2d736ddfae887c033c2168c8f29@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Sender: dwilder@us.ibm.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-05_09:2020-05-04, 2020-05-05 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=901 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005050126 Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [DISCUSS] DPDK PPC testing / CI X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On 2020-05-05 07:15, Aaron Conole wrote: > Hello David(s), > > I know you are keen on having PPC support in the DPDK CI. Right now, > we're seeing serious reliability problems with Travis for the ARM > support (and even Intel has been slightly misbehaving). We're not sure > whether the same issues exist under PPC. How extensive have you tested > with the PPC series and support under Travis CI? > > Just starting the conversation right now. > > -Aaron Hi Aaron I had been running the dpdk ci daily, however only a few runs last month as I have been distracted. I have see transient failures I attribute to the travis infrastructure issue, things like failure to install dependencies or out of space issues. The out of space problems I have only seen on ppc and arm. Dave