Re: [dpdk-ci] OBS pull request in pw-ci

["Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>]

Hi Aaron,

The dpdk community decided that the best place to maintaing the .spec and .control files would be in an OBS repository. Luca is currently doing that so that's where it comes from. As to how to update it - I included the exact string "home:bluca:dpdk" so that it's clear we want to use this repo, but it should be handled the same way as UPLOAD_GIT_REPO. I didn't see how this is supplied from the code in pw-ci, so I assumed it's something that's changed locally. I followed the same logic for OBS_SOURCE_PACKAGE and OBS_GIT_URL - the values that are there are what we should be using for our use case at this point in time.

I have a minor question about the pw-ci repo - is this your personal repo (i.e. not maintained by dpdk community)?

One last thing - we'll talk today about setting up a community OBS project (to mirror https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk - is this actually managed by the community?) in the CI call.

Thanks,
Juraj

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 9:14 PM
> To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
> Cc: ci@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: OBS pull request in pw-ci
> 
> Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> writes:
> >
> >> Hi Aaron,
> >>
> >> Have you had a chance to look at the pull request?
> >
> > Only a bit.  I will do something more thorough on Wednesday.
> 
> I looked through it and it seems okay.  I'll set it up to do a test run tomorrow,
> and merge it once that goes well.
> 
> If the obs source project changes (right now, it's set to
> home:bluca:dpdk) how should we update it?  Meaning, where does that variable
> come from (and if the robot needs to provide one at some point ever, how can
> we do that)?
> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Juraj
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> >>> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 7:32 PM
> >>> To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
> >>> Cc: ci@dpdk.org
> >>> Subject: Re: OBS pull request in pw-ci
> >>>
> >>> Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> writes:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi folks,
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > I've submitted a PR with OBS changes to pw-ci:
> >>> > https://github.com/orgcandman/pw-ci/pull/12
> >>>
> >>> Cool!  I'll take a look.  I was on PTO, so didn't get a chance yet.
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > I have a couple of points/questions:
> >>> >
> >>> > ·        The scripts are using
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:bluca:dpdk/dpdk to fork
> >>> the debian and
> >>> > redhat spec and control files.
> >>>
> >>> Okay.  A quick look shows that it's configurable, though.  Should be
> >>> okay.  I refer
> >>> to:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/orgcandman/pw-
> >>> ci/pull/12/commits/93f6baa497c85d7aca36cda6661e90f7a69d4709#diff-
> >>> e2ab32f32889186bdeb0ab4f0ef55282
> >>>
> >>> > ·        We should create a community OBS project (that the community can
> >>> manage) where the forked packages will be
> >>> > created and where the build will run (OBS_TARGET_PROJECT in
> >>> > 3rd-party/dpdk/jenkins-rc)
> >>>
> >>> Okay.
> >>>
> >>> > o   The project should be configured according to what we want to build -
> >>> distros/architectures. Can be done via OBS GUI.
> >>> >
> >>> > ·        Only after all patches have been submitted to a series branch does
> the
> >>> DPDK Jenkins job upload and configure an OBS
> >>> > package. This means that we'll have a build just for the whole
> >>> > series, not for
> >>> each patch. Not sure if this is a problem.
> >>>
> >>> The flip side is the amount of time to build.  We'd prefer to build
> >>> just one at a time.
> >>>
> >>> > ·        One thing that doesn't make sense to me is that the DPDK Jenkins job
> >>> builds dpdk after each patch - is this needed,
> >>> > since Travis is going to do the same thing anyway?
> >>>
> >>> Travis doesn't.  The ovsrobot travis build is configured to cancel a
> >>> build on a branch if a new one comes.  That way we only build the
> >>> latest.  Builds on travis take 40+ min to complete, so if a 20-patch
> >>> series came in, we wouldn't be done building it for more than half a
> >>> day.  Then if a v2+ is posted in rapid succession, we lost all this
> >>> time.  So for now, we only build the absolute last patch in the series on
> Travis.
> >>>
> >>> Also, the build server we run the robot on doesn't do the builds
> >>> anymore because it also got overloaded - so meson and ninja are not
> >>> the actual meson/ninja but just dummy commands.  :-/  Maybe I should
> >>> re-enable and see if things improved.
> >>>
> >>> > ·        I've added some more comments to the PR itself.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> >
> >>> > Juraj
> >>>
>