From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1670646B9D; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:50:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1FE4013F; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:50:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B02400EF for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:50:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [10.20.42.143]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8CxdXCj8Xho8yAsAQ--.50179S3; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 20:50:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.20.42.143] (unknown [10.20.42.143]) by front1 (Coremail) with SMTP id qMiowJAxE+Sh8XhoUvkaAA--.12779S3; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 20:50:43 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: Email based retests for the Loongarch lab To: Patrick Robb Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , David Marchand , "Brandes, Shai" References: <24d143d3-4739-457d-bf15-c6224ca21bb0@loongson.cn> <123907a4-bfa2-180d-7abd-fe4c498c5381@loongson.cn> From: zhoumin Message-ID: <404eaac9-72da-ffba-3d59-eb2617df03b8@loongson.cn> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 20:48:57 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux loongarch64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A917DB8CDBD12B6BEB8C67D7" Content-Language: en-US X-CM-TRANSID: qMiowJAxE+Sh8XhoUvkaAA--.12779S3 X-CM-SenderInfo: 52kr3ztlq6z05rqj20fqof0/1tbiAgEGAWh4kIUKjwAAsE X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBj93XoWrZryDGFy3CrW3WrW3tw17XFc_yoW8Jry5pF Z5Can2k34DZr9ruFn7Aw47Zry5ur9Yka9xJa40k395C3s8J3sFkrWSya90k3y7Ar93Wr42 vrW0k3sxZa98AFgCm3ZEXasCq-sJn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUr529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7KY7ZEXa sCq-sGcSsGvfJ3UbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy29KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9Gb4IE77IF4wAF F20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r 1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAF wI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67 AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1ln4kS14v26r1Y6r17M2AI xVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l57IF6xkI12xvs2x26I8E6xACxx1lYx0E2Ix0cI8IcV AFwI0_Jrv_JF1lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG 0xvEwIxGrwCjr7xvwVCIw2I0I7xG6c02F41lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCF04k20x vY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwCFI7km07C267AKxVWUXVWUAwC20s02 6c02F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF 0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE c7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14 v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7I U1-zV5UUUUU== X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------A917DB8CDBD12B6BEB8C67D7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Patrick Robb, On 2025/7/9 8:49AM, Patrick Robb wrote: > Hi Zhoumin, > > Aaron did approve the get_reruns.py patch for the rebase arg and merge > it to dpdk-ci. So, you are good to pull that into your dpdk-ci fork. > Thanks for your contributions. I have used this script to support the retest with rebase arg in Loongson lab. > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:16 AM zhoumin > wrote: > >> Maybe you can apply it, give it a run and add a tested by tag to >> the patch if it is working for you? > Yes, I have tested it and it is working for me. This patch has a > little changes in the inputs and outputs to get_reruns.py, and I > need to make corresponding changes to our current implementation > of retest. >> > Okay, thanks. When you get the free time to implement these change > please ping me so I know we are ready for any next steps (like > updating the labs recheck support status on the DPDK website). We support the rebase arg now when request to retest. But there maybe a little difference between Loongson lab and other labs. We recheck the patches on the latest HEAD of the branch specified by rebase arg if has or selected by pw_maintainers_cli.py script. I want to know if there will be any problems with this behaviour? Is it acceptable? --------------A917DB8CDBD12B6BEB8C67D7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Patrick Robb,

On 2025/7/9 8:49AM, Patrick Robb wrote:
Hi Zhoumin,

Aaron did approve the get_reruns.py patch for the rebase arg and merge it to dpdk-ci. So, you are good to pull that into your dpdk-ci fork.

Thanks for your contributions. I have used this script to support the retest with rebase arg in Loongson lab.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:16 AM zhoumin <zhoumin@loongson.cn> wrote:
Maybe you can apply it, give it a run and add a tested by tag to the patch if it is working for you?
Yes, I have tested it and it is working for me. This patch has a little changes in the inputs and outputs to get_reruns.py, and I need to make corresponding changes to our current implementation of retest.

Okay, thanks. When you get the free time to implement these change please ping me so I know we are ready for any next steps (like updating the labs recheck support status on the DPDK website).
We support the rebase arg now when request to retest. But there maybe a little difference between Loongson lab and other labs. We recheck the patches on the latest HEAD of the branch specified by rebase arg if has or selected by pw_maintainers_cli.py script. I want to know if there will be any problems with this behaviour? Is it acceptable?
 
--------------A917DB8CDBD12B6BEB8C67D7--