From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C2343E0A; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:41:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FC4402D4; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:41:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B773E402CE for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:41:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD301140102; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 02:41:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Apr 2024 02:41:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1712299291; x=1712385691; bh=KI5W5nt/d6CioXlon+Qr02KzKTtPJH5zHFdrvKgQyXA=; b= SnoDmPzHdYNLoWvzY6HQnhV4xkuR+P4p3n4L4r/pbuRJB3QSpU1w/fSYmZstOXyx 8WAVnXdMluLiPbr09piUj0hptvSc2rATL10nOkzn1eAfXqCm9G7W1xMH8jZDCkTJ laNMWaAYRGnuPdU7/bRdSfBwGLkM7riBOOzXHQj8SNddFyLu4CV6KYFChd1KHRI7 nCDW9swiLDQifwhNUysyCedG/DoZoYQQ1RpWt0kmkZo/Mh/zD1v5zwhjymZqCrhM 2HSPqLKqa+hULvTzjV1wLX1GfdHj61nVizgBjOb+9ZAyglA9CLPn2LFcJTXnjbPM aJigyyI2YRfvFdWA1PjDhQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1712299291; x= 1712385691; bh=KI5W5nt/d6CioXlon+Qr02KzKTtPJH5zHFdrvKgQyXA=; b=D C9azVWwJtDtaH5mwHFxgr8W+71u9KfyvOB36V2eW9L9sWcRLNOnzxyb7em2gwNVo Egx+RKvBRVtRzK+mK8uwrJ2BG7QsbnvxR/Y93Aa1KYAbj5g0PtShnn/0OAUDPIL0 SDTzFykk7eiLAP8KKAXECynW6IeLgU+HK5LT2uQc4wZIXv3C1qyJHam6Hq3TLML2 nyYWE6BhJLt02waoqaisizDRvaVTq+6f74p5mY/iD1lSgudPKcMWcDpKZg2ulx2/ LbEhVT8fAvNLheZRrmkgIulKLUDT5vATSzg5SXG9wU6DE/wS+gx0PcxYvI0TdYSC f6ZAmfFNPJuu/695RyWLg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudefledgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepteeijedvgedvhfekgeejvefggfeljeelvedvudffledvgfdv uefgfeehjeejieeknecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhj rghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 02:41:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Patrick Robb , Adam Hassick Cc: ci@dpdk.org, David Marchand , Aaron Conole Subject: Re: Adding Series Dependency to Patchwork Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 08:41:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4881077.GXAFRqVoOG@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, Yes I still think it is a valuable work to achieve. If Aaron agrees, I wish you can complete this feature upstream. Thank you 04/04/2024 15:50, Patrick Robb: > Hi Thomas, >=20 > Adam explains more completely in the preceding email, but he has > talked with the patchwork project maintainer, and determined the > needed next steps to do work adding depends-on support to patchwork > server. And he provides an estimate (35-50 hours of his time) for > adding this feature to pw. >=20 > What we want is a community opinion on using Community Lab resources > (our developer time) towards this effort on patchwork project. I'm > going to you, because you were the person who originally raised the > depends on issue and adding this support to pw server. >=20 > Given his time estimate, do you endorse this work, or do you prefer we > focus on our SOW items and other community requests which are in queue > right now? Thanks. >=20 > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:51=E2=80=AFPM Adam Hassick wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > There has been a discussion on GitHub between myself and others about > > adding support for series dependency to Patchwork. This would involve > > adding the feature to the Patchwork dashboard and git-pw. However, it > > seems like the maintainer would like us to do much of the required > > implementation work. I estimate, with a low level of certainty, that > > it would consume 35 to 50 hours of developer time. > > > > The active issue relating to this feature can be found here, as well > > as the archived one: > > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/583 > > > > Would it be worth it for us here at the Community Lab to contribute > > upstream to Patchwork? Implementing the feature in the Patchwork > > project will make our method for defining series dependencies the > > standard, and it may lift some of the burden of maintaining this > > feature off of us. > > > > Regards, > > Adam Hassick >=20