I mean config “build_type=meson” in DTS/execution.cfg, Snice DPDK don’t support “make” now, we have to use meson build. From: ci On Behalf Of Tu, Lijuan Sent: 2020年10月20日 21:40 To: Brandon Lo ; Lincoln Lavoie ; Chen, Zhaoyan Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; ci@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK Did you use meson build ? From: Brandon Lo > Sent: 2020年10月20日 21:19 To: Lincoln Lavoie >; Tu, Lijuan >; Chen, Zhaoyan > Cc: Thomas Monjalon >; ci@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK I think this should be brought up to the DTS maintainers. DTS' initial behavior is to build DPDK/testpmd, and it assumes that testpmd is in the build's output directory. Thanks, Brandon On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:38 AM Lincoln Lavoie > wrote: Is this because of the change that adds some python requirements to testpmd? I remember seeing something about that go by on the lists. Cheers, Lincoln On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:34 AM Thomas Monjalon > wrote: 20/10/2020 14:31, Brandon Lo: > Hi everyone, > > Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK? > > Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile > DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is > not building testpmd. > We are also using the latest commit available for DTS. No testpmd should be built. -- Lincoln Lavoie Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1j_iI6anwrnbQWNpTyuvukMLSNJJ8_8QU&revid=0B_0ujwABDnFZTmJiR3EzK0d1VjFKTjQvMENBWVM0QnA4ajhjPQ] -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu