DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>, "ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] DPDK Lab
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:24:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B066756B75@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3B5C7B6C@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Majority (90%) of the time, the subject prefix on the patches should provide the hint. If the majority of the patches start with "net/" then it's for next-net, and similarly for crypto. Patches with virtio or vhost go to that tree, etc. There will be edge cases where we get it wrong or just can't automatically determine the tree, but those patchset should perhaps have delayed checking after we have manual assignment of tree. What could also work in those cases is to wait to scan them until we get a delegate assigned in patchwork, as that will tell us what tree they are to hit.

/Bruce

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, Qian Q
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 6:26 AM
> To: ci@dpdk.org
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q
> <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> Subject: RE: DPDK Lab
> 
> To do the per patchset performance test, we need to know that the
> patchset's target repo. Any thoughts here?
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 7:46 PM
> > To: Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Erez Scop <erezsc@mellanox.com>; O'Driscoll, Tim
> > <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>; Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; 'Vincent
> JARDIN'
> > <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>; Guillaume Gaudonville
> > <Guillaume.Gaudonville@6wind.com>; Shreyansh Jain
> > <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>; 'Kevin Traynor' <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> > Subject: Re: DPDK Lab
> >
> > 2017-04-06 09:57, Xu, Qian Q:
> > > As to the per patchset performance test, as you know, there are many
> > > repos
> > for DPDK now, so when a new patchset coming, which repo should it go to?
> > Maybe it doesn't go to dpdk master, but go to dpdk-next-virtio, or
> > others, but automation tool doesn't know that.
> > > As to per patch build, we are trying the patch on different repo to
> > > find the one
> > that can pass build, but as to performance test for per patchset, we
> > must apply the patchset into correct repo/branch or else the code didn't
> work.
> > > Any comments here?
> >
> > For most of the patches it should be obvious to determine the targetted
> repo.
> > We should add a script in dpdk-ci to get the repo name from a patchset.
> > Anyway, this technical discussion should be on ci@dpdk.org.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722C837C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
     [not found] ` <HE1PR0501MB21370D6ACD0931D36925D085BD0D0@HE1PR0501MB2137.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
     [not found]   ` <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3B5BA2BB@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
     [not found]     ` <1564461.MHdNEdeViC@xps13>
2017-04-13  5:25       ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-04-13  6:46         ` [dpdk-ci] script to determine target repo (was DPDK Lab) Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-25  6:23           ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-04-25  6:24             ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-04-25  6:37             ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-04-25  6:41               ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-04-25  6:48               ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-25  6:50             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-06-21  7:45               ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-06-21  8:20                 ` Richardson, Bruce
2017-06-21  8:33                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-06-23  8:43                     ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-06-23  9:30                       ` Richardson, Bruce
2017-06-26  3:47                         ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-06-26  6:23                         ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-26 13:26                           ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-06-30  8:41                     ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-06-30  9:22                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-13  8:24         ` Richardson, Bruce [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B066756B75@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).