Brandon, we almost made a workaround.
Maybe tomorrow, you could recover Intel’s testbed. I will let you know soon.
Regards,
Zhaoyan Chen
From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 3:34 AM
To: Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing
Hi Zhaoyan,
Have you finished making changes on the Intel machine?
I will turn on the machine on March 3rd for testing if you do not have any issues with it.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:13 PM Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com> wrote:
Hi, Brandon,
Yes, it’s a wired issue. And it also mixed our DTS upgrading and Trex upgrading.
So we are reviewing our DTS script, different Trex version, and CI calling procedure.
Anyway, we are focusing on this task recently, any update will let you know.
Thanks.
Regards,
Zhaoyan Chen
From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 10:46 PM
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing
Hi Zhaoyan,
How is the current status of the Intel 82599ES?
Were there any configuration changes made to fix performance issues?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
Hi David,
This was just a weird issue with the packet generator not cleaning itself after a test fast enough before another test.
I'll rerun the tests that were affected and keep an eye out to see if it's stable enough to be put back online.
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi David and Zhaoyan,
>
>
> Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled testing for the Intel testbed.
>
> The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications.
Any news about this?
I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header).
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/
But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test.
--
David Marchand
--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824