DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com>
To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>,
	"dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: "bugzilla@dpdk.org" <bugzilla@dpdk.org>,
	"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomasm@mellanox.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Ye, Xiaolong" <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [Bug 431] Missing performance results in Patchwork checks, and possible false positives
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 13:31:57 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0PR05MB440157B5ECC5753020F9C386D7D70@AM0PR05MB4401.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-431-149@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ci <ci-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of bugzilla@dpdk.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 5:43 PM
> To: ci@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-ci] [Bug 431] Missing performance results in Patchwork checks,
> and possible false positives

Patchwork is reporting a false positive on patch https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68908/ (at least) for iol-mellanox-Performance because of this.

Two reports were sent by the lab for this patch in the following order:
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-April/127163.html (Failing, Sun Apr 19 13:57:32 CEST 2020).
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-April/127165.html (Passing, Sun Apr 19 14:06:51 CEST 2020).
And even though one of the reports is failing, the current status says passing on Patchwork.

What's the reason why aren't all the performance test results for a vendor sent in the same report?


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-19 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-31 14:42 bugzilla
2020-04-19 13:31 ` Ali Alnubani [this message]
2020-04-22 16:34 ` bugzilla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM0PR05MB440157B5ECC5753020F9C386D7D70@AM0PR05MB4401.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=alialnu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=blo@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomasm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK CI discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
	public-inbox-index ci

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git