From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B682A00E6 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 20:07:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BBF1B95B; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 20:07:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com (mail-ot1-f68.google.com [209.85.210.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EB74C8D for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 20:07:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id u15so4910353otq.10 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:07:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2Lh/T+S4yr1ebk01acT/qdt7iBZ01FZKcQ8N2s/geis=; b=OuxveSUyHyDSk8v6Lgg7sQtiahD4CvajqDx8mYSPVyG/SyHFT4j65A5XHRoo9s5vWi qBeeiS4JYLav/F2ieqIQmR9LRu3WJyeEU7/UecMmtR+ejdzrjFQeZmyeoDa/N0YKWhjR pxVSLHv1ZfO3fGIAvgHHiHG8NQadYA3y8xJYU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2Lh/T+S4yr1ebk01acT/qdt7iBZ01FZKcQ8N2s/geis=; b=Sj3MiCkk34D9Erngl7WL2NEwFPQDLbr8FjU73OqKg7YMne074MscuKPvrSWOGWRkn8 MP1q271Qe8YgxWYdpI8/W/xFeQLzMGzEM2DEMP0UktYPN5KDiYHNfyHCB3cTduvBVtUs HQknS7CDH+pkF3VaI+qFqtDC5ngirzVxTpqiNsi2vqqnSCxZyvcgIQiHMwSl15pz5xRb NG13zKCNQDmfJBB+INcoQh7hepajKzEIK4HEu1PaFPsN6QLlCWe5jg1MkBErgLvKA4Z4 YZ8KRrwM5552Lk4fVvcVeN6kULD+MyUW9qhtDX6M5bFBH+ZCHkaYlJkr6UCus5J/F1TF EfKw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWBBy6K9zEGYAf5NgQakaiG5c9S4uEgh8IttdpTawgR0ed4bpnG fPlMUylkA3tbp+cyTyvmxU2gLx2z+XcorkFQFIOLaA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyYElIVuCjRYk41NnW4u47mKt3uA8Vuy8U0p8Tam4HC6W5/jLra62uvdsQgcjXJewZCvM2Lexa2EohQx3doI+Y= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5784:: with SMTP id q4mr3143631oth.277.1555697229781; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:07:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190216160206.11957-1-alialnu@mellanox.com> <2149176.42v1TqmSes@xps> <1669577.NWkuDTEeDI@xps> In-Reply-To: <1669577.NWkuDTEeDI@xps> From: Jeremy Plsek Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:06:33 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Ali Alnubani , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "ci@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4] add script to decide best tree match for patches X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 1:55 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 19/04/2019 19:33, Jeremy Plsek: > > I thinks so. Only more patchsets will tell, but that could be improved > > after the fact. So I think it's fine to merge it in. > > > > At first glance, the only part that I don't think is implemented is > > mentioned here: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166#c35 > > > We must match the common prefix of the git trees. > > > Examples: > > > dpdk-next-net-intel + dpdk = dpdk > > > dpdk-next-net-intel + dpdk-next-net-mlx = dpdk-next-net > > Since some of the patches are being set to dpdk-next-net-mlx instead > > of dpdk-next-net. But I'm fine with how it is right now and wouldn't > > mind it getting changed to this later on. > > It is supposed to be fixed. > Please could you give an example of a misbehaviour? The most recent example is series 4380. For me, that returned dpdk-next-net-mlx. > PS: please avoid top-post, it is making thread hard to read. Sure. It would be great if it wasn't the default for Gmail ;) > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:24 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > > 19/04/2019 18:21, Jeremy Plsek: > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 4:16 AM Ali Alnubani wrote: > > > > > Did you guys get a chance to test this version? > > > > > > > > We've switched to using it a few days ago. > > > > Some examples of it switching branches: > > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5503/ > > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5499/ > > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5498/ > > > > > > Is it working as you expect? > > > May I merge it in dpdk-ci? > > > > > -- Jeremy Plsek UNH InterOperability Laboratory