From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD74A0C41 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 22:30:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2618A410FB; Fri, 7 May 2021 22:30:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-f174.google.com (mail-lj1-f174.google.com [209.85.208.174]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77014410E0 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 22:30:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-f174.google.com with SMTP id a36so13130760ljq.8 for ; Fri, 07 May 2021 13:30:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pn05WxZvb2l4gAIh/hO4WsoMs34bkEMyYepH71Fdj2g=; b=LHYkkO8g6Z2hf0oQttfHjK/LP1e2g7NsW4JYQv3BGUPqRfw1B43vhK/lckgs8a//kz LmVbGVTaX5hNhCdQGt6ef+En9pxXsQkVqhtlyeCjua9rYuOxRSp7ZvaE2Y5GgM+GX282 R/NYLw9dHo8omjK3nAxPGSRb94/NDDTiMeKmg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pn05WxZvb2l4gAIh/hO4WsoMs34bkEMyYepH71Fdj2g=; b=WIehUNJuk4MxV3B5kEykK7C4eMsW7kcdaZBjzBlyXQJ1PAhmQgt3RuzKYR8Uyp4J7J GwRGeA791PV2EvxIWGeLhheSI0G1B8JCrSICSSggxAN3edYB0Ezu/SSTiLVfatkxHnSM mqfRc8ySaDaOVmmA8unaVzh7V3woxgob7XNkKrK9nkWTYjjQMyIgm8V7MlEoWdM49/3o L4ZenHSJB2wjA5WyQM64yis8vbkJbLdj/Ci0jgoxrV4iY7XKnWJp9bE623MU1IHyfkx3 WEKP/dOJoNPq7P/wcnicVx6/CpoEN952nd8jOpzqPouQBBLHx5yDduFJsplJyHDYpWb1 w4tQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oTum1uDJ5K7hAOoxdUHwQ/5/ATJJtSopP05/ju+p/58AJHlt+ 6xZBjq80KdaxiuxkoFlCMTGAV0KgDIIiTtLBathnJg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqYHII3zTcMbdn2DH+sjoHbW3cRklvGi1ve1mgmYX8ybMmZZFdeHhbMIMJURiTBbVgmJ5nKuGoGePfr1LIHN8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9810:: with SMTP id a16mr9470479ljj.78.1620419456043; Fri, 07 May 2021 13:30:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Liu Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 16:30:20 -0400 Message-ID: To: Jie Zhou Cc: Aaron Conole , "ci@dpdk.org" , Brandon Lo , Owen Hilyard , Lincoln Lavoie Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000109e3505c1c34ed6" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [EXTERNAL] Re: Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Archived-At: List-Archive: --000000000000109e3505c1c34ed6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The rerun has been kick off. The test result on the patchwork will be updated shortly. Thank, David On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Jie Zhou wrote: > Thanks Aaron! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Conole > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 5:47 AM > To: Jie Zhou > Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Brandon Lo ; Owen Hilyard < > ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dpdk-ci] Help with a rerun of failed > ci/iol-intel-functional > > Jie Zhou writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This patchset > > (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fpat= c > > hwork.dpdk.org%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F1620241931-28435-11-git-send > > -email-jizh%40linux.microsoft.com%2F&data=3D04%7C01%7Cjizh%40micros= o > > ft.com%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd0 > > 11db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846642838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC > > 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sd > > ata=3DFOtKE7%2BzuGhSR1uIZSCdvnKJ31oQgq1o6RE6U1KuGno%3D&reserved=3D0= ) > > hit CI lab test failure on ci/iol-intel-functional > > (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fla= b > > .dpdk.org%2Fresults%2Fdashboard%2Fpatchsets%2F16955%2F&data=3D04%7C= 0 > > 1%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf8= 6f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846652833%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3= d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000= &sdata=3D74kKnF9U1d%2Fy10TqMkDZE4kdiVCtZbWkWz4R7KJWS4Y%3D&reserved= =3D0). > Per looking at the log, don't see how that is related to the change from > this patchset (previous versions passed this test and this V13 just > trivially resolve a header file 1 line patch apply conflict). Wondering i= f > is it possible that you help with rerun this test for the patchset to see > the failure is intermittent or not? Appreciate your help! > > I see errors like: > > ------------------------------------ > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/supersocket.py", lin= e > 134, in __del__ > self.close() > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line > 514, in close > set_promisc(self.ins, self.iface, 0) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line > 165, in set_promisc > mreq =3D struct.pack("IHH8s", get_if_index(iff), PACKET_MR_PROMISC, 0= , > b"") > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line > 380, in get_if_index > return int(struct.unpack("I", get_if(iff, SIOCGIFINDEX)[16:20])[0]) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/common.py", lin= e > 59, in get_if > ifreq =3D ioctl(sck, cmd, struct.pack("16s16x", iff.encode("utf8"))) > OSError: [Errno 19] No such device > > ------------------------------------ > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/pexpect/spawnbase.py", lin= e > 166, in read_nonblocking > s =3D os.read(self.child_fd, size) > OSError: [Errno 5] Input/output error > > ------------------------------------ > Looks like it's something in the infrastructure or configuration of the > HW. CC'd the lab folks. > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Jie > > --000000000000109e3505c1c34ed6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

The rerun has been kick off.
The test result on the patchwork=C2=A0will be updated shortly.

Than= k,
David

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com>= ; wrote:
Thanks = Aaron!

-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 5:47 AM
To: Jie Zhou <ji= zh@microsoft.com>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Brand= on Lo <blo@iol.unh.= edu>; Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dpdk-ci] Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-= functional

Jie Zhou <jizh@m= icrosoft.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
>=C2=A0
>
> This patchset
> (https://nam06.safelinks= .protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> hwork.dpdk.org%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F1620241931-28435-11-git-send=
> -email-jizh%40linux.microsoft.com%2F&amp;data=3D04%7C01%7Cj= izh%40microso
> ft.com<= /a>%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd0
> 11db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846642838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC=
> 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&am= p;sd
> ata=3DFOtKE7%2BzuGhSR1uIZSCdvnKJ31oQgq1o6RE6U1KuGno%3D&amp;reserve= d=3D0)
> hit CI lab test failure on ci/iol-intel-functional
> (https://nam06.safelinks= .protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flab
> .dpdk= .org%2Fresults%2Fdashboard%2Fpatchsets%2F16955%2F&amp;data=3D04%7C0=
> 1%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988= bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846652833%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ= sb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1= 000&amp;sdata=3D74kKnF9U1d%2Fy10TqMkDZE4kdiVCtZbWkWz4R7KJWS4Y%3D&am= p;reserved=3D0). Per looking at the log, don't see how that is related = to the change from this patchset (previous versions passed this test and th= is V13 just trivially resolve a header file 1 line patch apply conflict). W= ondering if is it possible that you help with rerun this test for the patch= set to see the failure is intermittent or not? Appreciate your help!

I see errors like:

------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
=C2=A0 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/supersocket.= py", line 134, in __del__
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 self.close()
=C2=A0 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.p= y", line 514, in close
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 set_promisc(self.ins, self.iface, 0)
=C2=A0 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.p= y", line 165, in set_promisc
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 mreq =3D struct.pack("IHH8s", get_if_index(iff), PA= CKET_MR_PROMISC, 0, b"")
=C2=A0 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.p= y", line 380, in get_if_index
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 return int(struct.unpack("I", get_if(iff, SIOCGIFIN= DEX)[16:20])[0])
=C2=A0 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/common.= py", line 59, in get_if
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ifreq =3D ioctl(sck, cmd, struct.pack("16s16x", iff= .encode("utf8")))
OSError: [Errno 19] No such device

------------------------------------
=C2=A0 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/pexpect/spawnbase.= py", line 166, in read_nonblocking
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 s =3D os.read(self.child_fd, size)
OSError: [Errno 5] Input/output error

------------------------------------
Looks like it's something in the infrastructure or configuration of the= HW.=C2=A0 CC'd the lab folks.

>=C2=A0
>
> Thanks.
>
>=C2=A0
>
> Jie

--000000000000109e3505c1c34ed6--