From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20DB43B84; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:51:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE77402A2; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:51:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-yb1-f169.google.com (mail-yb1-f169.google.com [209.85.219.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E6B4027F for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:51:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yb1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dcd7c526cc0so89996276.1 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:51:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1708631473; x=1709236273; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ae6ANVSJ+aK3Qcx29OffbzK+qifpdRKhshOO0mxb67M=; b=abWxB/bX10CN+QwxEV2c9NYZi9G3ugU59F2v5TM2G2U7a0UHeA6u9XlYbxsrKcIFyh sMZBLCWVXLaNyG1CjhplnZzPy5pmlsEbN0/vZsqJoGKfMBt3/bUhfWNzyv/0Ov/Ait65 1MhIaMNLCOzmJ0UdK0Q435h+nSpfSSRDwV25k= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708631473; x=1709236273; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ae6ANVSJ+aK3Qcx29OffbzK+qifpdRKhshOO0mxb67M=; b=mB5Kj9nfajlNHwPOSe+rgZsexY/VQu04PYW13LlIKYjGdcDXv9T4wdU7lS2inzL32d wxKkr/wKQ2td//p9Blasjg6jLrolQ0r9GHyHLST/zLY9yYvmTAuSGjm/1I1Ih8uyYhwe GJjdAwlSzDFiE8iabW/oItmsB943pqIAxcVfDSyDsqTLliOsSFTegxSjMNik6sOHXNyK 883vwnJ6frb0egFVMt7jWFFVM6cR8eEZLvbWEg+HKan6UMlSWZHLjWBy/XyonnTOzbVZ wghSPywlB1OAIVENxhTi6tW50XILzT9j4tficGPX0xE0Vl8J0rFQXscYCWTmQWZjxZ8O rHag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxnWmq4JnkI+NZBDy/FeRaMC6YcsiqyuVzXGsWKEjjWj0N7lAQK GL88pBghJD1rbzMLZ1HRpE2KLmh9WtloIsXft+muREK2YvuGuBvuDcfMKI9LvMF7QKqOWr+78cL QfhJadT1UVA/hMU7c7IXlRnS9sN2NeiVeGorhwRmmIYycGxS3ehg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEbwcmy0FTtw++CLld+L4OiABmwnTTNhHOY8L8G0K0bO5BhU2fHI7sgj0mGLQnY10gBBM4eO5yO7yteChONTZo= X-Received: by 2002:a25:b946:0:b0:dc6:3610:c344 with SMTP id s6-20020a25b946000000b00dc63610c344mr160518ybm.13.1708631472749; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:51:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Adam Hassick Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:51:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Adding Series Dependency to Patchwork To: ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hi All, There has been a discussion on GitHub between myself and others about adding support for series dependency to Patchwork. This would involve adding the feature to the Patchwork dashboard and git-pw. However, it seems like the maintainer would like us to do much of the required implementation work. I estimate, with a low level of certainty, that it would consume 35 to 50 hours of developer time. The active issue relating to this feature can be found here, as well as the archived one: https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/583 Would it be worth it for us here at the Community Lab to contribute upstream to Patchwork? Implementing the feature in the Patchwork project will make our method for defining series dependencies the standard, and it may lift some of the burden of maintaining this feature off of us. Regards, Adam Hassick