From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <ramirose@gmail.com> Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com [209.85.208.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486BA1B47C for <ci@dpdk.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:46:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id b14so31394483edt.6 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 02:46:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9IPaSxkY2QioMs7/OgHos4pZazC5fsBIPzObNQ2pb64=; b=HabS4q7tjEV8HlPJqdP4MblT3CIrAEWE3jn7QJoZlDU4/hQC15LO+1S5axFUTJsFL/ 2Om6dbsWbhTxv054Ge1n0C7Q1A6GhhQtwTamC53DHKEmrT7/B9C+8uZcVeuJ3g7sSbMf 6Rl/beIJriyq6mMJjRZJ/YAXKHfrD8yCukDDF4KWAcXQUP1qyCpzGCq75ulpbXhsTExj jNfZ1UqFYWk64ZoK06bLIeDMzMZTrEDCorrs1GfRzXEUE2PPeeTBYsPF0y2sher30Qam KzI9QDw1nzoKZ+I/zOIubH6yz0228pqejCEoZ4kS+Ons1RBHf37MxbIT+o3j2Xx4jY4f c1Tw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9IPaSxkY2QioMs7/OgHos4pZazC5fsBIPzObNQ2pb64=; b=OlCl+kBCXXg/9sRNfXJBsgmpPHJ1834O5kgSYjK2Ov+o7S5DRGN0bPISpJ7oIcFz5A mJ0ICErQ3TDP6srGyK40Lx3Mys5dWnCM9WOpyekBfFn9ORkRNs28RYn5vmqq4ckBTV7W Z7VqC/AxaxwU6pnPKvhSdPK952fNAZtPELjye+7W7SHpPS9WoyUjwefrK3Eyu07ryrLL fsw/MQgv9GhjdgU5kerGLD2zRZvtzmF+CNxl6k5YzWMQOHDN2F7pIWHfIm2l/mvLga8+ oZJU6cCb2fqyRLZs3Re2keZcBEJY602E/xbOPeAdb3CWQFHNzod3YXtehIhRbhw+BPWA tb/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfiIrtXDNibzIvrn3Lokbtw5pLx57++V+YRkWKo1wc2BQgE5skb vHdD4op12vfLJvv7hqF767rfJwggGL6TbeVYgN6Ft8VWOdU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6FdzTZ35aklFY2YyhG8FjhhgYCCBqRNGGS8jAgXQ22uB0UOlcL/wsbi/CzD6328phCfePKLw6PGURNoh8ztKA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4a0d:: with SMTP id w13-v6mr10778120eju.128.1546598768698; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 02:46:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:45:58 +0200 Message-ID: <CAHLOa7TnitO=wrB69B3b8BEvrV_va1pXrAGwUe+0euioQy1PZQ@mail.gmail.com> To: ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000037ed71057e9f96b0" Subject: [dpdk-ci] Question about performance test X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/> List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 10:46:09 -0000 --00000000000037ed71057e9f96b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I have a question about DPDK CI process and the tests done when a patch is submitted to dpdk-dev mailing list. In DPDK patch work I see these response messages from the DPDK CI for all patches: ... ci/intel-Performance-Testing success Performance Testing PASS ci/mellanox-Performance-Testing success Performance Testing PASS ... My question is (I hope and believe the info is available publicly) : which tests are run in the ci, generating these messages? is it done with IXIA and DTS ? (DPDK test suite, https://doc.dpdk.org/dts/gsg/) ? are these l2fwd/l3fwd performance tests? or more than that ? and on which Intel/Mellanox nics ? Are these merely performance tests, or also functional tests ? And BTW, I noticed that the CI runs a full performance cycle also for doc patches (at least these messages are generated), which is a kind of redundant (unless there is some filter which checks that if a patch only affects modules under "doc", than such a cycle is not done but the messages are still sent) Regards, Rami Rosen --00000000000037ed71057e9f96b0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi,<div>I have a questio= n about DPDK CI process and the tests done when a patch is submitted to dpd= k-dev mailing list.</div><div>In DPDK patch work I see these response messa= ges from the DPDK CI for all patches:</div><div><br></div><div>...</div><di= v><div><div><font color=3D"#333333" face=3D"Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Aria= l, sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:14px">ci/intel-Performance-Testing<= span style=3D"white-space:pre"> </span>success<span style=3D"white-space:pr= e"> </span>Performance Testing PASS</span></font></div><div><font color=3D"= #333333" face=3D"Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><span style= =3D"font-size:14px">ci/mellanox-Performance-Testing<span style=3D"white-spa= ce:pre"> </span>success<span style=3D"white-space:pre"> </span>Performance = Testing PASS=C2=A0</span></font></div></div><div><font color=3D"#333333" fa= ce=3D"Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-siz= e:14px">...</span></font></div><div><font color=3D"#333333" face=3D"Helveti= ca Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:14px"><br><= /span></font></div><div><font color=3D"#333333" face=3D"Helvetica Neue, Hel= vetica, Arial, sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:14px">My question is (I= hope and believe the info is available publicly) : which tests are run in = the ci, generating these messages?=C2=A0 is it done with IXIA and DTS ? (DP= DK test suite,=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://doc.dpdk.org/dts/gsg/">https://doc.d= pdk.org/dts/gsg/</a>) ? are these l2fwd/l3fwd performance tests? or more th= an that ? and on which Intel/Mellanox nics ?=C2=A0</span></font><span style= =3D"font-size:14px;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:"Helvetica Neue&quo= t;,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif">=C2=A0Are these merely performance tests, or= also=C2=A0</span></div><div><font color=3D"#333333" face=3D"Helvetica Neue= , Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:14px">functional t= ests ?=C2=A0</span></font></div><div><span style=3D"font-size:14px;color:rg= b(51,51,51);font-family:"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-ser= if"><br></span></div><div><font color=3D"#333333" face=3D"Helvetica Neue, H= elvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:14px">And BTW, I noti= ced that the CI runs a full performance cycle also for doc patches (at leas= t these messages are generated), which is a kind of redundant (unless there= is some filter which checks that if a patch only affects modules under &qu= ot;doc", than such a cycle is not done but the messages are still sent= )<br></span></font></div><div><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_sig= nature"><div dir=3D"ltr">Regards,<br><div>Rami Rosen<br></div></div></div><= /div></div></div></div> --00000000000037ed71057e9f96b0--