From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912FAA0A0F for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 20:29:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535DF4068F; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 20:29:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com (mail-oi1-f178.google.com [209.85.167.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA50440147 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 20:29:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id r17so400628oic.7 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:29:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LSB3TuSvhr6ldXyV5ZC1yLb7zYNNZTkEjP7/NGGCqk8=; b=XOgPM3GN7Kl1Jn+UtE7REjHmRwZqjxjCJTepGoDTAJpr8jDDD1GyGUwD/bBvMCnmV6 R6Td4GM7AopYv0lryKbjHstROMNTT++KTDst7+fhiyhi7wxK6zvFMI81xIGiPmb8CKmu rnMI/PL94u01rG+i1WoIrck3Xmki/ZEjehlmE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LSB3TuSvhr6ldXyV5ZC1yLb7zYNNZTkEjP7/NGGCqk8=; b=Wc7BNWyXkWMOP8jJKHDlEMgkDwUkw+cNL9XOcfo02ucJp2CfFbqtvn1fpKtLcLWaw8 CVA0AOj33GAeutsAp+UaPt5pLrGJkcVYVQQ68icFKbUkYYnvZ4tH3tI6FzBBZNhe1H4k 21to2BlgzXkkIIP90GdSNcXwiUoXq9Hfz7cHnIVcVmbShso5bk4TZ1BFfjvD5P1nqcdJ GdCS2XUkzSV7lOa0KRroNrZ73waLo5tZx/65okG7A2JTTgJ4DVAw1Jv98Rubxi3OuYN5 65IGxU4Cq9xz8KfFARiKEmiVMoXPZeZCsgyFwGM9kX5hXaIHQj5f8g8mF+QJHw+IFkgT DpUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AE4HcSmD9l1gBI5VEywVqkGLxyk81nu1uaqpslYjX6kKNrUuf Xvfu6f8JMen12RvdMN8WUTH0bsesEqfOFKEanb1rYQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbveU7VDEUI4S1Biz9zNzXAy3hoKA1rZGKUTlnCCzwonoQMlQkoXnQ+GbY/qSc7ac9p+Z61PUavezoA5/Josg= X-Received: by 2002:aca:c046:: with SMTP id q67mr12040457oif.79.1622831364871; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:29:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Owen Hilyard Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 14:28:49 -0400 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Thomas Monjalon , Ray Kinsella Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000008aecb05c3f4dfdf" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] ABI test failing for openSUSE and Arch Linux X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --00000000000008aecb05c3f4dfdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" All, The ABI reference seems to have been generated incorrectly. After re-generating the ABI reference and re-running all of the patches, ABI passed for all affected patches. Owen Hilyard On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 10:02 AM David Marchand wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:53 PM Lincoln Lavoie > wrote: > > > > All, > > > > The ABI references for all systems were updated this week to the 21.05 > release code. The two failures look like places where the interfaces > didn't actually change. We do see the failures across multiple patches, > which might imply something got merged that caused these changes / failures. > > I checked ABI for 64307fad7d2b ("telemetry: remove static limit on > callbacks count") against v21.05, yesterday. > There is no issue. > > The report I mentioned > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/17309/ is for a patch > added on top of 64307fad7d2b. > And the patch for this patchset won't break ABI. > > > Can you confirm the ABI check runs fine against the main repo? > I can't find a report for it in lab.dpdk.org. > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/tarballs/ > > > -- > David Marchand > > --00000000000008aecb05c3f4dfdf Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All,

The ABI reference seems to have be= en generated incorrectly. After re-generating the ABI reference and re-runn= ing all of the patches, ABI passed for all affected patches.

=
Owen Hilyard

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 10:02 AM David Marchan= d <david.marchand@redhat.co= m> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:53 PM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The ABI references for all systems were updated this week to the 21.05= release code.=C2=A0 The two failures look like places where the interfaces= didn't actually change. We do see the failures across multiple patches= , which might imply something got merged that caused these changes / failur= es.

I checked ABI for 64307fad7d2b ("telemetry: remove static limit on
callbacks count") against v21.05, yesterday.
There is no issue.

The report I mentioned
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchs= ets/17309/ is for a patch
added on top of 64307fad7d2b.
And the patch for this patchset won't break ABI.


Can you confirm the ABI check runs fine against the main repo?
I can't find a report for it in lab.dpdk.org.
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/tarballs/=


--
David Marchand

--00000000000008aecb05c3f4dfdf--