From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F948A0C46 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:19:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DE94069B; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:19:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f182.google.com (mail-oi1-f182.google.com [209.85.167.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6A34003C for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f182.google.com with SMTP id v22so25837899oic.2 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:19:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3kh+m850J9e9kq2WvNMkvF0uyD+QQOfaYZi+Qf3nRsM=; b=QgpXE8V/ih3IGJqueJEuEu34ZKDhWkn/JidQftnvsTp5TzNqUa1BAHvhuP+RhIUEcr lRCZv7c+lfJGZa+q4POefAgGfxtrPuumCocY0MaIrgxoxnkPcUb3hkfvGhRpk08Q13Jz zHVuQp9jrwn2aqF91+bslmPWPm8vGwp7euzGA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3kh+m850J9e9kq2WvNMkvF0uyD+QQOfaYZi+Qf3nRsM=; b=d27mp9kTakh27jk+igxU6ZuBMHIE5QpvTPjvzPsVUsozlbuwz1dQC0oyzCxq0VIqIp eAodcQzynuyAvbEuca7+9QiU/o7MprK3ywxY/6qD/kEzp69nFenKASl7gx3EL4rE1wx0 gaJdW5Mfdkd2xECt7ocEkxqNcdNsu/mOy4ULqorkcH3YsXSssDedy8fVWyDtZz9Cq1IE v0GZL1W84oT47aqTPRkq6a5463bhRuhdcfstiDQrh54WXzHvVqHQkHIuHTi0VogE1FzU PAY0QbQyQGP+sYmJ2ZLyCWbEmzFZ0df9fBbOSmAv9oJgUhwAVrvjN7dczBQNmDCBA1M3 CG7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hdsC7oocNbmCHrzV5aOnP2lYch6RxxnBviZTist9GbIWgpHe7 byG6Dxx/uAhucytfuxaU7yaQfSilT5tlkxNY4F0XOw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFhQuue+aql1ebe2/1KG68L1BK6J3nQaiX5aiKgDpPL5fkeWoguuADpx2gkIdzw6ZAA50X2Gu9cuhfBgnKUEM= X-Received: by 2002:aca:c046:: with SMTP id q67mr7336601oif.79.1623259194808; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210526214343.31352-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com> <20210527212421.24224-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com> <20210609185219.5eefdddd@sovereign> <20210609194851.5ff889b4@sovereign> In-Reply-To: <20210609194851.5ff889b4@sovereign> From: Owen Hilyard Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:19:19 -0400 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , dev , Zhihong Peng , Neil Horman , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af6feb05c4587bd9" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v2] pmdinfogen: allow padding after NUL terminator X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --000000000000af6feb05c4587bd9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Dmitry, Those failures are the result of a known issue with that machine. Those tests were disabled on that machine shortly after you submitted that patch. I've re-run the patch. Owen Hilyard On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:48 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote: > 2021-06-09 12:01 (UTC-0400), Lincoln Lavoie: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > If the failing test is the unit test func_reentrancy_autotest, that is > > being looked into , as it seems like the test case does not reliably run. > > It passes / fails between different systems running both on bare metal > and > > in virtual environments, on different OSes and architectures. > > > > Do you have a link to your patch in patchworks or the lab dashboard? > > Hi Lincoln, > > Yes, this is func_reentrancy_autotest failure. > Dashboard link: > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/17240/ > MTU and stats can hardly be affected by this patch. > --000000000000af6feb05c4587bd9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dmitry,

Those failures are the resul= t of a known issue with that machine. Those tests were disabled on that mac= hine shortly after you submitted that patch. I've re-run the patch.

Owen Hilyard

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:48 PM Dmi= try Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@= gmail.com> wrote:
2021-06-09 12:01 (UTC-0400), Lincoln Lavoie:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> If the failing test is the unit test func_reentrancy_autotest, that is=
> being looked into , as it seems like the test case does not reliably r= un.
> It passes / fails between different systems running both on bare metal= and
> in virtual environments, on different OSes and architectures.
>
> Do you have a link to your patch in patchworks or the lab dashboard?
Hi Lincoln,

Yes, this is func_reentrancy_autotest failure.
Dashboard link:
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchs= ets/17240/
MTU and stats can hardly be affected by this patch.
--000000000000af6feb05c4587bd9--