From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8B0A0350 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:44:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB02E07; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:44:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53516DE0 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:44:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593157442; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Uew1/VPhpP0/4kcGP/2S0h++7Mdp1xQoOUsEcCMM7FM=; b=CNQ5vqeTume6SH6jzJqWNKES29tgYI8NlXVOD3SrFx6OatBrkaN8RKjFOT3o2hLagTJVtT F73+6nA3VC3sXf86xzh8dnqOVrD7qOcYk3bUGNyJqx5ya/pjBT3pHduJKfjmgu8K8HorQv U3SgIw/8nH/w3CXcEL5EWECYAOnHw1Q= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-459-wJYBckBcOo6AgD5L5Lwojg-1; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:44:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wJYBckBcOo6AgD5L5Lwojg-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id e12so162507vkd.3 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:44:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Uew1/VPhpP0/4kcGP/2S0h++7Mdp1xQoOUsEcCMM7FM=; b=cixBlewaZS0xclKIr609yOdFUw/xejSeQ8uoqmPlvBHoFeIVrNVKco/JdeZYhnqsWC fZWTWRYl9xXOI+v3DDcqf2HjEY4YjA5FEVrs7fzI3TS15gv+z2S8v+3w61IpNjUQfKj8 fYYwYMTQNFqGRMr6Lxw0+nAueFUsTdgmA2Rq7OE67c4aZjmKpYDff+s+xscWLAFN8VBO LjZ0Gf8bk03E55OmtwDQIUcm/buIwIbLvz2BsifOfewsO7QKMklHU5fcp0ZuMGl61ZYD HZG+ymFplYZKXbOz+sSJbKcUHml1UkX166oWurOzCIHxZW9814H1f0t1vonKyFo3ym+Q FPRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oL4lAdkKPqPZS7OGfTnghMonSXNJ6eods9lvfw1WKs2azXpCK njG0JoL8rEL3U9Fqc8MZqy6X9Khn4I8xTGRGDsccAWAjMkS2m9PKvMhkCow2/sn5NHgWjSwZDcz +IJxLXnu9DAy5z+O3LA== X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fc6:: with SMTP id v189mr1471930vsv.198.1593157439811; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:43:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpXVcgkviTg+5V+SGZ188pvpqHa8ppazzAdXSOEvQ15r49bFdeDPr2+ZICZ1QzesZpzVPfemswh260igT0sFE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fc6:: with SMTP id v189mr1471915vsv.198.1593157439457; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:43:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:43:48 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Chen, Zhaoyan" Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" , sys_stv X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Failures reported by Intel CI for series 10551 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:03 AM Chen, Zhaoyan wrote: > > Hi, David, > > For your question, "Is it normal to see all patches with the exact same test report?" > Yes, we always test a series, rather than a single patch. You can see the exact same report > on any patch in a series. (it's convenient, you don't need backward to search > the header of the series, then check result) Convenience is subject to interpretation :-). Other CI systems send a single report which is more sane for me. > > " One thing that comes to mind, do we have dpdk headers installed system- > > wide on the Intel CI server(s)?" > > Sure, we do. We don't see any problem on other patch compilation, so far. but it's strange > that your V2 and V3 is same, but v3 test is failed. (code base is same). So I will try to re-run > your series(v3), and check what's changed on CI system between the 2 days. Is that helpful? Just to be sure. By this, you mean that you have some dpdk headers installed on the CI system in /usr? Having those headers most likely exacerbates races with dpdk headers copy in the building directory. This could be where my series failed. -- David Marchand