From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED90A034F for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 14:21:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8189D410FB; Fri, 7 May 2021 14:21:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BA94013F for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 14:21:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620390108; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r5Z6gI7MA6ltut6cCB/L/EBbf85Zz8J+BWiUjXqwLNE=; b=FRBKY9WKpH9w6ZvN3s3P5wovTdy55EsyKYaDlWCYwQaDiPTU50dk8pNKYRktOFXhQT2eWp MY5qbHuELXg0t1o2jNYkCLTKk+PJqaWFCOWq+JXVLfSeBLaYWP9dxkNEoc/wgpKfYwfj8a YZh8phtlWkS7tshYGGnH8mrzhoj0H2E= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-31-0IuRQqVfPnKQRGc8pZiJlw-1; Fri, 07 May 2021 08:21:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0IuRQqVfPnKQRGc8pZiJlw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id u21-20020a67c8150000b029022a6f03b431so763371vsk.9 for ; Fri, 07 May 2021 05:21:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r5Z6gI7MA6ltut6cCB/L/EBbf85Zz8J+BWiUjXqwLNE=; b=HnkJH0+eAvV00HSPX2yG4INux0lw1/BAQ6T3wYLcPmUt2fsUALCvQYuGz9t6OvviV9 YyZeFl6vwc8zQQcZBQZm3k5Nsu5DYEMN74YBBl7uhsnsdIMSZeVEdiHWudywbCs9xDyr e2aqmgJmG9yf3xnKkR3A7pWlNjRrD0JnNH0xNbaYprHCfYchHsPpRgoVpS2K2T4R289B ySk29KDpqNL0Gag4lGM/H4r5bmQa2aF1RKB0OCrZigXa38pTp1y8tm35rg0TlF9ZuGMQ ha3fXo3cs/YVnUNa9in4N/evD2L7oWW4Vle14/eCtDlQsuHRBX8NzK7DSDGBou9Q+TYB 5J1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533eNll5F++OXTLKvOtZiNgm+ayKwlkoFWe54eiD1ZTJNPu1PqQw jIh44MlqEabBzUlcPCHiRFqj7Yx/Tw0YYrtPzTP3eXMB3nK25XnUyJyxaFgKF2lldAt0Eyog/sj 7sY/DZJacryFK28xcKQ== X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6497:: with SMTP id p23mr8094126uam.86.1620390105037; Fri, 07 May 2021 05:21:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpIfnbPagx6jr3UNGjaLj4N0LEa8SNu4Fz95ncbkC7GqKkj4uQxNf5WWnirj+zSVw8lWt4rEHgVeUqrYakw9s= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6497:: with SMTP id p23mr8094096uam.86.1620390104753; Fri, 07 May 2021 05:21:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210506151426.28202-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210506151426.28202-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 14:21:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: dpdklab Cc: dev , ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] 21.05 fixes for OVS X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 5:15 PM David Marchand wrote: > > Testing OVS build against 21.05-rc2 revealed some issues. > Bits were also missing on OVS side, so for people interested, a > rebased dpdk-latest OVS branch is available at: > https://github.com/david-marchand/ovs/commits/dpdk-latest I got failures for a "dynamic_config" job running on the Mellanox server from the lab. I don't see how my patches could break this. Max segment number per MTU/TSO: 40 Switch name: 0000:05:00.0 Switch domain Id: 0 Switch Port Id: 65535 06/05/2021 14:03:20 TestDynamicConfig: set_up_all failed: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jenkins/dts-func/framework/test_case.py", line 258, in execute_setup_all self.set_up_all() File "tests/TestSuite_dynamic_config.py", line 93, in set_up_all self.verify(ret.lower() == self.dest, "MAC address wrong") File "/home/jenkins/dts-func/framework/test_case.py", line 169, in verify raise VerifyFailure(description) exception.VerifyFailure: 'MAC address wrong' 06/05/2021 14:03:20 dts: TEST SUITE ENDED: TestDynamicConfig The DTS code does not seem to have changed recently. Is this test stable? -- David Marchand